One must have debated a lot with theist, but if that guy debated with an atheist, he might find they have many things in common. Atheists, after all are just a bunch of people who are unhappy with religion. It's evident that they are influenced by religion, their lifestyle and other things, and if one is unhappy about this lifestyle, they would start gathering conspiracy theories and then inevitably end up an atheist.
Atheists claim that God doesn't exist(pretty obvious), but how do they make this claim? They would argue like "If God is so perfect, why would He command someone to kill a children?, do you think killing a kid is bad?", or sometimes, "God make the eternal hell for us, to torture those who doesn't worship him, so God is so graceless, He couldn't be real" but mostly, "Do you have evidence that God exists?". They would complain about all the killings in the Bible, Quran. Not only God, Allah too, they would ask the muslims, " Your prophet Mohammed is a killer, a guy who raped and discriminated women", well, enough of that.
From the point of atheism, we are living in an indifferent universe, "INDIFFERENT". This is where I ask, why do they judge, look, analyze any kind of religion on grounds of morality? It's obvious, influenced by religion, they started to believe that killing is bad, stealing is bad, raping is bad etc. I'm gonna say this again, we are living in an indifferent universe, there was never a word such as good or bad or morality, only the laws of physics. So that means you can kill people whenever you want? Yepsolutey, how is dipping a metallic element in a bunch of carbon compounds bad? How is carrying a suicide bomb, and then start the chemical reaction in the bunch of carbon com... bad? I'll tell you what, there's nothing such as bad, it's just a "happening", a minor minor change in the vast vast universe(s).
So, I'm sorry to say, atheism is a "belief" that God doesn't exist, suicide bombing is bad, killing is bad.
" Atheists are without the proof that killing is bad, suicide bombing is bad, killing a child is bad, waging wars is bad, yet these statements are one of the reasons why they are atheist, how they proof that religion is bull..."
So, why do they keep on saying that suicide bombing.... is bad? They came up with a new morality with their three pound brain(which they derive from religion), to convince people that these stuffs are bad, even though there are no proofs for such statement. They would probably limit themselves.
Atheists should never say killing is bad to stump a religious people, suicide bombing is bad, to stump a religious people.. why? There's nothing such as good and bad, it's just what your three pound brain thinks, and they have no proof that killing is bad.
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.