For an agnostic you certainly sound very committed to a seemingly unshakeable faith in the existence of the Abrahamic god, more than most theists in fact. What the hell can you find to argue about with christians....? You seem to believe the bible is the very word of god and all the fake prophecies in it as being true; that the writers of the bible were truly inspired by god to write their lies; you shift the burden of truth like a theist and here you are disputing the honest intelligence of atheists.
You show no doubt about being able to know or believe. You dont come across as an agnostic.

Let's compare the assumptions of both sides.

Goddidit side:
1) The supernatural is real.
2) A deity is real.
3) The abrahamic deity is real.
4) That deity inspired prophecies.
5) Those prophecies were written by the people credited within it.
6) The prophecies were written before the events.
7) The prophecies are all 100% true.

Skeptic side:

1) People wrote the prophecies.
2) People lied about the time that they were written.
3) The prophecies are vague.
4) The prophecies are not inspired by any deity.
5) The abrahamic deity doesn't exist.
6) The prophecies were not always written by those credited within the bible.

Examining the goddidit

The supernatural is full of unfalsifiable claims. We simply cannot verify them, so we default to not believing them. If we did believe them all, we would believe contradictory things. #1 -4 falls within the unfalsifiable category.

#5-7 These, through studying the texts and any contemporary texts, has been proven false.

Examining the skeptic side

#1 This has been proven true.
#2 This one is very likely, as we have many, many examples of people lying about things related to their religion.
#3 This has been proven true.
#4-5 These are unfalsifiable.
#6 This has been proven true.

Tallying up the scores.

Godiddit: 4 unfalsifiable, 3 false
Skeptic: 2 unfalsifiable, 3 true, 1 likely

Let me know if I missed anything.

The OP doesn't make any kind of logical sense at all. I see no algebra in bibles, no scientific equations. Why would I want to rely on an old book, with no scientific equations in them? Could I rebuilt the internet, based on the bible alone or other holy texts?

Ask me your question (as I don't have time to read everyone's comment, sorry!), and I'll do my very best to answer it. Ask me anything you want.

Ask21771,

You are totally wrong. I, who has lived forever and can influence human minds, though I am not a god, was the one inspiring these so- called prophecies as kind of lame jokes.

I dare anyone to prove it was not me. As I am here now, I am the simplest explanation.

This reasoning is highly flawed. It does go into a circular form so I wouldn't use this at all.

One very simple explanation which doesn't assume divine intervention is that the thing that was prophesied happened then later, then the written word was made. Another: the written prophesy was made first and... it was a lucky guess that it happened. Now, if you could show that a certain book contains prophesies and 100/100 happened AFTER the work was made, maybe you'd have a case on your hands.