Since the reticence of apologists is predictably defining on objective evidence, and catholic frauds seem to be being offered in their place, lets take a look at some so we can get feel for just how unreliable and how lacking in integrity that church and religion has been throughout its history when perpetrating fraudulent "miracles".
---------------------------------------------------
"In the Sicilian region of Italy, in the town of Palermo, on the mountain dubbed Pellegrino, nestled inside a cave, inside a church, inside a small shrine, lie the bones of Saint Rosalia.

Her story is rare in the annals of Catholic sainthood, as she wasn't martyred in a particularly grisly way. Instead, when she was a young teenager, Rosalia devoted herself to Christ and lived as a hermit in a cave until dying, of natural causes, in 1160. There, her bones lay for centuries, until a plague struck Palermo in 1624. Residents began having visions of "the Little Saint," and a hunter, looking for any kind of cure, went to her cave, dug up her bones, and paraded them through the streets. The plague miraculously ceased. That was good enough to get her sainthood, turn her former abode into a place of worship, and for Sicilians to get on their knees and pray to this particular set of bones."

>>So far so good, now read on...

"Just one problem: The bones in Saint Rosalia's shrine belong to a goat.

This revelation came in 1825, from British geologist William Buckland, who, while on his honeymoon, made an examination of the relics and determined them to be "non-human." (Buckland also concluded during the trip that dark spots on another church's floor being presented as "drops of martyr's blood" were, in fact, drops of bat urine.) But rather than fixing the mistake and getting rid of the goat remnants, the church has the same bones on display today."

and it goes on....

""In Sicily, they will fight you if you tell them the bones belong to a goat," said Paul Koudounaris. Koudounaris is an author and photographer specializing in macabre art. In 2013, he published Heavenly Bodies, which details the story of relics retrieved from Roman Catacombs in the 17th century. Relics are everywhere in Catholicism. The head of St. Catherine is on display in Siena, and vials of breast milk straight from the Virgin Mary's teat occasionally pop up. There are even rumors about the Holy Foreskin, a taut, wrinkly piece of the tiny Baby Jesus Himself.

"They had a warehouse in the Vatican, like that warehouse in Indiana Jones, and they had these relics all labeled. Here are three St. Valentines, here are four such-and-such, and they'd just send them off," said Koudounaris. "I've photographed at least six different [skeletons of] St. Valentines. It's one of the problems with the relic trade: There's not a lot of fidelity."

(I contacted various members of the Catholic Church for this piece, but none was willing to speak about the process by which relics were authenticated.)"

As I said I wouldn't trust the RCC farther than I could throw a small truck...

More here... https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/jmbwzg/the-weird-and-fraudulent-world...

JoC "I've actually been on a search for evidence around mid last year and have been convinced by the evidence that I see. So I ask you, what kind of evidence are you looking for?"

Yet you have not posted any here? All we've had is a subjective claim for a "miracle" from an 8th century monk?

If you have objective evidence you find compelling why wouldn't you post it here, that makes no sense? Unless you know it's not really objective evidence at all of course, and are finding it compelling for subjective reasons? As you did with the unevidenced claim for a miracle, where no evidence was offered that the tissue had been miraculously transformed from wafer and wine.

Edited for spelling and grammar.