★★ The human race is inherently atheistic (says simple science)

25 posts / 0 new
Last post
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
★★ The human race is inherently atheistic (says simple science)

Myth God Image Credits: Kerenos, Mtg Art

The human race is inherently atheistic, as we physically shan't believe.

How?

(1) International belief definition:

“To accept as TRUE…..”

(2) International atheism definition:

"To lack belief or to disbelieve in God or gods."

(3) International scientific uncertainty:

We physically shan't believe, as there is uncertainty in any event; that is, we are NOT OMNISCIENT of any event.

So, rather than believe/accept as TRUE, we may regard events as PROBABLY/partially certain.
[ie we shan't believe in anything, and so we shan't believe in God or gods]

(4) Simple terms:

As we are not omniscient, we can't validate/believe (absolutely) whether God's existence is true/absolute.
Thusly, the human race is atheistic.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Author: http://folioverse.appspot.com/
Non-beliefism Cult Basis: http://nonbeliefism.com/
Non-beliefism Cult Home: http://non-beliefism.appspot.com/
Non-beliefism Cult Info: http://non-beliefism-info.appspot.com/
Non-beliefism Cult Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nonbeliefism/

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

Nyarlathotep's picture
sigh, and he has started

sigh, and he has started bumping it. Well I guess I'm guilty too by making this comment. :(

ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Bumping what?

Bumping what?
You do know this is a new post?

Furthermore, this post mostly encourages atheism.
My prior post mostly encouraged non-beliefism.

If you are referring to the signature at bottom, I include that signature in every post.

Pay keen attention to the content, rather than the signature at bottom.

Nyarlathotep's picture
Bumping is when you do

Bumping is when you do something that brings attention to your thread after you make it. You made a new thread, then you bumped it.

ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
@Nyarlathotep

@Nyarlathotep

I did no such bumping.

The only time I returned to this NEW thread, was to respond to you.

Keep in mind that my signature, does not link to any thread before this new one**

chimp3's picture
PGJ: Belief is possible. Many

PGJ: Belief is possible. Many people believe in god(s). You may or may not be good at programming computers but you can not program people and their language. Sorry to inform you.

ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Ironically,

Ironically, it is especially when Gods are concerned, that belief is not possible.
Persons tend to say they believe in the existence of God, unconditionally.

As I mentioned before:
(1) We shan't believe/ie we shan't regard any event as true.
(2) Belief is illogical, whether the definition construes truth, or not.

From website: "Thusly, belief is illogical abound the absolute and non-absolute description paradigm"

So, non-beliefism had long encoded that belief need not be described to contain truth/certainty; whence belief is illogical regardless.

chimp3's picture
Whether belief is rational or

Whether belief is rational or not does not mean people do not believe. This is a very flaccid attempt to manipulate the definition of belief .

ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Chimp3 quote:

Chimp3 quote:
Whether belief is rational or not does not mean people do not believe. This is a very flaccid attempt to manipulate the definition of belief .

Simply, "theists" erroneously think they can believe absolutely, in the existence of God.

However, "theists" are not omniscient.

Keep in mind that "theists" don't think that God is probably true.

So, they lack both the PROBABILISTIC degree of belief, and the non probabilistic ABSOLUTE degree.

So, "theists" are athiests.

chimp3's picture
OK! Let's extend that logic .

PGJ : OK! Let's extend that logic ...

White Supremacists believe the white race superior to all other races. Science tells us that race is only a social construct. Therefore it is impossible for a non-existent racial category to be superior to any other. Therefore , White Supremacists are not racist.

Male Chauvinist Pigs believe men superior to women. Science tells us that woman are not inferior to men. Therefore it is impossible for a men to be superior to women. Therefore, Male Chauvinist Pigs are not sexist.

The Pragmatic's picture
LoL *thumbs up*

LoL *thumbs up*

No reply by PGJ? I wonder why?

Nyarlathotep's picture
Let me try:

Let me try:
Joe likes the color black. Science tells us black is not color. Therefore Joe does not like black!

The Pragmatic's picture
Hmm... I'll try a reverse

Hmm... I'll try a reverse version:

I'm out of shape. Science tell us that round is a shape. Therefore I am in shape.

Algebe's picture
Forum guideline 7: No non

Forum guideline 7: No non-English posts

Could you translate whatever point you're trying to make into plain English. What does "illogical abound the absolute and non-absolute description paradigm" mean?

Nyarlathotep's picture
ProgrammingGodJordan - The

ProgrammingGodJordan - The only time I returned to this NEW thread, was to respond to you.

V.S.

ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
I ponder, how had you

ProgrammingGodJordan - The only time I returned to this NEW thread, was to respond to you.

V.S.

I ponder, how had you attained such a screenshot, at the point after roughly 4 posts were made?

Had you taken a screenshot and stored that image after the original post was made, and before the 4 comments (including your initial bumping comment)?

Or did you simply manipulate an image?

I still don't recall bumping..

Nyarlathotep's picture
I took the screenshot when I

I took the screenshot when I saw your bump. Why? Because I guessed correctly (based on your past behaviour) that you would lie about it!

ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
As I said, I don't recall

I don't recall bumping.
I am curious.

If you had initially saved a screen shot, 4 comments (including yours) before your first accused be of bumping,
Why did it take you said roughly 4 comments (including yours) before posting that screen shot of the bump?

Nyarlathotep's picture
ProgrammingGodJordan - If you

ProgrammingGodJordan - If you had initially saved a screen shot, 4 comments (including yours) before your first accused be of bumping,

The first post in this thread is yours (of course). The second post is mine where I accused you of bumping. So 4 posts/comments before that would be:

2 - 4 = -2

post number negative 2! You're insane. Wait is this more of you cultist math?

ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Read the remainder of the

It appears you had not read the remainder of the question.

Here it is for convenience:

ProgrammingGodJordan quote:

Why did it take you said roughly 4 comments (including yours) before posting that screen shot of the bump?

Also, note that I was referring to all comments, including yours, as indicated by the words 'including yours'.

Nyarlathotep's picture
Why did I wait to post it? I

Why did I wait to post it? I guess I was waiting to see if you would lie about it.

Pitar's picture
Horsefeathers. No one has

Horsefeathers. No one has innate knowledge of anything about their surrounds that their own sensory system isn't informing them of. That would be 5 senses, people, not 6. Distrust is a learned thing and that's what this particular thread is about. Man works hard at both trust and distrust. The latter is the mark of man meaning he cannot trust himself to be trusted. He has proven himself to be unworthy of his own respect. What, then, must he do to find peace in his life? Invent gods. He can ascribe to them the trust missing in his own world. He seeks it in another world instead and then he spends the rest of his life worshiping his other-worldly inventions.

This is pretty obvious.

But, he is created without notions of deities. He invents them instead. His inner peace needs them and that's where he keeps them safe and waiting for the day he'll join them. In this sense, he brings atheism into the natural world at birth and then, by those who reject it, he is indoctrinated by their inner gods. He will then develop his own psyche-driven inner god(s) and take his place in life's worship queues for such things.

That is also pretty obvious.

And, all of it is common sense deflected by those who need their gods. Again, obvious.

Thinker's picture
I must be dense, I cannot

I must be dense, I cannot follow pgjs' posting with a clear line of reasoning. There must be some good smoke out there....

Nyarlathotep's picture
Thinker - I cannot follow

Thinker - I cannot follow pgjs' posting with a clear line of reasoning

I can't follow it with a muddy line of reasoning; giving him the benefit of the doubt at every turn...

Endri's picture
The Human race is completely

The Human race is completely Atheist technically, no Human was ever born believing in something until words of "Gods" are fabricated into their minds.

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.