Evidence for the resurrection of Christ

17 posts / 0 new
Last post
Jamie's picture
Evidence for the resurrection of Christ

Hello my friends hope you're all doing well.

I would just like to converse with you about the evidence for Christ's resurrection for a few reasons

The first reason being I know you're all really knowledgeable people so there is as little chance, if this evidence is flawed that it'll be detected.

The second reason being to see if this evidence holds up well.

So let's get started.

I will only use one verse from the Bible then after that I will not be using the Bible at all.

The one verse is this in 2 Peter 1:16 "For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty."

So here Peter is saying that he and the disciples witness the majesty of Christ talking about seeing him and him resurrected.

Now, historical texts say that Peter and the apostles and Paul was martyred for this witness of the resurrected Christ.

Ignatius in AD 110 claimed that Peter was the bishop of Rome

Irenaeus of Lyon in AD 180 agrees that Peter served in Rome

Tertullian in AD 195 said "on which the apostles poured out their whole doctrine with their blood; where Peter had a passion like that of the Lord, where Paul was crowned with the death of John (the Baptist. by being beheaded)."

Dionysius of Corinth, AD 200 said "Peter and Paul at Rome and at Corinth; for both of them alike planted in our Corinth and taught us; and both alike, teaching similarly in Italy, suffered martyrdom at the same time"

And lastly Eusebius reported the crucifixion of Peter and Paul's beheading as well, and When he reported the crucifixion of Peter and the beheading of Paul in Ecclestiacial History, he was simply passing along a tradition which has been the unanimous opinion of the church for two hundred years.

Now, my question is this why would the apostles and Peter and Paul claim they saw the risen Jesus Christ and give up their lives to preach about him and be Hated and tourtured and ultimately killed, for a lie?

My prediction of one your responses may be "but don't people die for mistaken beliefs all the time"

Yes, but the apostles died for what they said they saw (emphasis on saw) not a belief.

So it's either they really saw the risen Christ or they did it all for a lie they knew, which would be absurd.

What are your thoughts or possible rebuttals on this?

All the best.

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

algebe's picture
All of your "historical"
watchman's picture
Detective in Christ...….
Grinseed's picture
@DiC...2 Peter is a poor
Sheldon's picture
The bible isn't evidence of
Sapporo's picture
In 1917 at Fátima in Portugal
Sapporo's picture
According to @Detective in
Sapporo's picture
Even if Peter was killed by
algebe's picture
@Sapporo:
Old man shouts at clouds's picture
@ DiC
Sapporo's picture
In terms of being willing to
HIMELO's picture
All the proof you're looking
Sheldon's picture
Do you know what fictional
Cognostic's picture
1. Flaw Number 1. "I will
HIMELO's picture
Do you debate whether
Sapporo's picture
HIMELO: Do you debate whether
Kataclismic's picture
I was in a debate group

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.