Who's the toothpaste salesman on the right side of those pictures?

Why do born-again happy-clappy evangelistic pass-the-loot hucksters always have such great teeth? Watch out Little Red Riding Hood.

@ Uberdem

Lets analyse the picture you have kept referring to:

-------------------------------------------------------
"Atheist fairytales!"

Richard Dawkins: Living beings evolved from s single-celled organism billions of years ago.
William Lane Craig: How did life originate?
Richard Dawkins (Magical phrase): We don't know!
William Lane Craig: If you guys don't know, you are liars by asserting that living beings evolved from a single-celled organism!
Richard Dawkins: Someday, we will completely manipulate the evidence and make up a more convincing fairytale, I mean theory!
-------------------------------------------------------

This is of course some immature misrepresentation, not only of Richard Dawkins but also of William Lane Craig as well.

"Atheist fairytales!"
Atheism has nothing to do with the Theory of Evolution, Abiogenesis or even science. There are lots of people of various levels of religious beliefs and from various different religions, that not only accept the scientific answers, but are scientists themselves.
The author reveals his ignorance in his own words.

"(Magical phrase): We don't know!"
If an answer is not known, in what way is it "magical" or somehow dishonest to say "We don't know"? It is the ONLY honest answer if the answer is not known. Calling it a magical phrase is not just ridiculous but incredibly ironic, considering what people of faith say to defend their beliefs.

"...you are liars by asserting that living beings evolved from a single-celled organism..."
These are two separate concepts mixed together:
1. How life got started (abiogenesis):
Needs a lot more evidence, the answer is still uncertain, (but abiogenesis do have supporting evidence).
2. How life evolved (The Theory of Evolution):
Has an solid foundation of supporting evidence. The answer is known to a very high degree of certainty.

"Someday, we will completely manipulate the evidence..."
A childish attempt at trying to troll anyone who understands the scientific method, while simultaneously revealing that the author lacks understanding of what he is mocking.

Life is just a chemical reaction. To say that life cannot come from non-life is to say that the chemicals and metals that make up your body cannot create a living body, and yet they do. Non-life, in fact, makes life.

You can get specific about the beginning of life from no life but it's readily apparent that it only requires a specific mix of non-living chemicals, we don't have to know the specific mixture to come to grips with the mechanics.

faith is only wishful thinking life started from the first cell made up of molecules amino acids such as proteins I would rather anytime go with Charles Darwin origin of the species 1859 any day then to claim that I or mankind came from a supernatural entity that you call GOD.We cannot perceive a god there are so many people worshipping god or multi gods from the Egyptians to the greeks to the reomans etc etc.today there are some 22,000 denominations that claim exclusivity to a god in the so called protestant faith. why all these different teacgings? why all the confusion.if there is a god then why a simple teaching.

Debunking the picture;
#1, single celled organisms ARE living things.

#2 Evolution and Abiogenesis are completely different theories, mixing them up is like mixing up car manufacturing and driving.

#3, semi-strawman Craig is one judgemental bastard. So... we're liars if we can't explain how cars are made in the middle of describing a driving incident?

#4 again, Evolution and abiogenesis are different things and single celled organisms are living things. Therefore, Abiogenesis happened BEFORE single celled organisms. Not after, BEFORE. There, evolution fom cingle celled to multi celled organisms and the formation of bacteria are unrelated things alltogether.

#5 quite frankly, the inability to admit you made a mistake makes makes hypothetical Craig the dishonest one. It's called Intelectual Honesty, admitting you don't know something. It''s a sign of self-awareness and therefore intelligence. If you do NOT admit you don't know something, you're even stupider AND a liar.