Christians come to this forum to make wild claims. The latest is that there is strong evidence accepted by many authorities of history and among them even atheist historians.
The fact is there is no historical evidence of jesus. I cite this article that explains this in great detail please read.
Researchers have discovered that there are no eyewitnesses of jesus. None of the gospels could have been written by any eyewitnesses. Saul/Paul never met jesus and his letters came some 80 years from the time that he claimed to have had "a vision".
The claims that Josephus and Tacitus's accounts are problematic because they could not have been eyewitnesses and there is evidence that what they wrote was rewritten by christian scribes centuries after the fact.
So the claims that a historical jesus validates the claim of a biblical jesus are pure falsehoods.
There is no historical jesus not a shred of evidence to support such a claim that there was a historical jesus.
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.