Has nature ever created a code?

1352 posts / 0 new
Last post
Sheldon's picture
" congratulations to you

" congratulations to you atheists"

Thanks, speaking on behalf of "us atheists" that means a lot.

Now can you demonstrate any objective evidence for a deity?

Only you seem to have nothing but argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacies.

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
Wow, that was a FAST COS!

Wow, that was a FAST COS! (Change of subject)

But anyhow have you an answer for my last inquiry?

arakish's picture
jnv3: "But anyhow have you an

jnv3: "But anyhow have you an answer for my last inquiry?"

Yes, see below, or look above for the same response.

jnv3: "I was hoping for a cerebral comeback but I’m met with desperate lack of responses, and I am to infer that computer programs were created for our understanding which has nothing to do with all important sequences, a red herring, congratulations to you atheists"

You are answering your own question. English must not be your primary language. Nor your secondary language, nor your tertiary...

Notice the BOLD text in your own statement...

rmfr

Sheldon's picture
J N Wontlearntoreadever.."Wow

J N Wontlearntoreadever.."Wow, that was a FAST COS! (Change of subject)

But anyhow have you an answer for my last inquiry?"

Yes, please feel free to read any one of the dozens I've posted that litter this thread.

Now. can you demonstrate any evidence for a deity?

Randomhero1982's picture
Can you demonstrate ONE

Can you demonstrate ONE causal link that takes us from a natural explanation of 'X' phenomena to a supernatural explanation?

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
I refuted that nonsense if

I refuted that nonsense if yours, tell me how a computer program is created for the purpose of my understanding. Wtf that has to do w sequences?

Randomhero1982's picture
I refuted that nonsense if

I refuted that nonsense if yours, tell me how a computer program is created for the purpose of my understanding. Wtf that has to do w sequences?

Bollocks have you, not one of you lot have even attempted to demonstrate that one causal link that follows a chain of natural occurances and verifiably place a supernatural phenomena.

It is vital to the question because you clearly think codes exist outside of natural phenomena and they do not, it is how humans perceive things.

Everything follows natural paths and consequences without the need to envoke a magical cosmic wizard.

Unless you can demonstrate one exists, hence the offer to demonstrate a causal link... it should be easy enough.

And none of you can.

arakish's picture
jnv3: "I refuted that

jnv3: "I refuted that nonsense if yours, tell me how a computer program is created for the purpose of my understanding. Wtf that has to do w sequences?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1c9g2z4sSM

rmfr

arakish's picture
@ jnv3

@ jnv3

To understand how a computer program was written to help you understand, think on this:

What does the computer program do?

Answer that, you have answered your question.

Go back to school and learn English. Your comprehension capabilities has proven you have absolutely no understanding of the language.

rmfr

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
Your insults are rich and

Your insults are rich and much appreciated.
A computer program decodes coded instructions which get executed and accomplishes a specific task.
Does eating pumpkin pie help me understand?

Sheldon's picture
"Does eating pumpkin pie help

"Does eating pumpkin pie help me understand?"

Aw, honey you're wasting your pie.

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
So does it? I’m feeling your

So does it? I’m feeling your red herring is coming back to bite you

Sheldon's picture
I could care less what you

I could care less what you feel, you have ranted on endlessly for page after page and offered not one shred of objective evidence for your belief. It's all coloured bubbles and appeals to ignorance from you, and has been from the start. You're simply too dishonest, and closed minded to bother with.

David Killens's picture
I wish he had offered a

I wish he had offered a definition of "code" on day one.

Because J N Vanderbilt III, the train has run off the tracks and you bear sole responsibility.

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
You have your definition, can

You have your definition, can you deal w the fact that codes and pumpkin pie do not exist for the purpose of understanding?

Tin-Man's picture
Re: "can you deal w the fact

Re: "can you deal w the fact that codes and pumpkin pie do not exist"

Wait..... *confused*... If pumpkin pies do not exist, then what the HELL is that I have been eating for the past two months???... *worried look*...

arakish's picture
And to add to what TM posted.

And to add to what TM posted...

What the hell were all those pies I have been eating every thanksgiving and christmas for the past 55+ years?

https://kairoswarriors.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/scaredshitless.jpg

rmfr

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
I think you should be worried

I think you should be worried you and you seem to be unable to make an attempt to answer me !

arakish's picture
@ jnv3

@ jnv3

You have been answered. You are just being a sorry shiste by moving the goal posts every time you are answered. Go back and re-read the thread.

And download this Rhetological Fallacies information kit: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fiqjfthqe5pefxf/RhetologicalFallacies.zip?dl=0

rmfr

CyberLN's picture
.

J N,

Attachments

Attach Image/Video?: 

Yes
J N Vanderbilt III's picture
you purposely left out the

you purposely left out the whole sentence talk talk about dishonesty , that’s rich

arakish's picture
@ jnv3

@ jnv3

talk about dishonesty

I did not include the whole sentence either. However, practicing the "move the goal posts" fallacy is an even worse act of dishonesty.

rmfr

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
What goalpost? I’m trying to

What goalpost? I’m trying to get an answer how pumpkin pie or a computer program, which I defined, exists for the purpose of my understanding them? Wtf does that even mean?

Tin-Man's picture
Re: "I think you should be

Re: "I think you should be worried you and you seem to be unable to make an attempt to answer me !"

While I cannot speak for others, there is a saying I heard many, many years ago that has often served me well. It goes something like this....

"One should always try to avoid arguing with an idiot. Because after a couple of minutes, any outside observer may find it difficult to determine which of the two is the actual idiot."...... *merrily skips away back to the playground*....

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
You seem to be the idiot

You seem to be the idiot suggesting that things exist so I can understand them, WTF!!!

arakish's picture
Hey Tin-Man!

Hey Tin-Man!

Skip your rear right back over here. I need to borrow your hands. This one truly requires the quadruple facepalm.

Me dad told me the same thing. Thus, go back to school little boy and don't skip so many classes this time around.

rmfr

J N Vanderbilt III's picture
With out a doubt you are

With out a doubt you are backed into a corner and refuse to answer for your preposterous notion that a code exists so I can understand it. This is NOT the purpose of codes. Not a wonder that you obfuscate , still pretty shameless on your part

Tin-Man's picture
@JNV Re: "Not a wonder that

@JNV Re: "Not a wonder that you obfuscate"

Yes, but only in the privacy of my own home. Almost found out the hard way you can get arrested for doing that shit in public.

arakish's picture
@ jnv3

@ jnv3

I finally figured it out. They say it sometimes skips generations. You are number 3. We are going to have to the wait until number 4. Just watch out for the Mogadorians...

One last time. There is no such thing as any code in any thing any where. The only code that does exist is in the minds of humans in order to give them a framework in which to understand how things work.

If you cannot understand that, then you need to do as I have suggested. Start school over at kindergarten, and don't skip so many classes to smoke weed with your friends. Off to school with you little child.

***tree shambles back off into the forest***

rmfr

Sheldon's picture
J N Vanderbilt III, can you

J N Vanderbilt III, can you demonstrate any objective evidence for your deity? All you have offered is an argument from ignorance fallacy, a god of the gaps argument.

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.