Indian High Court Compares Atheist Republic to Trump!

On March 28th, the Delhi High Court asked Twitter why it had not banned accounts that posted objectionable content against a Hindu goddess. Vipin Sanghi, acting Chief Justice, and Justice Navin Chawla made the statement during Aditya Singh Deshwal’s hearing on Monday.

In July last year, Deshwal filed a complaint against Twitter to target Atheist Republic’s Twitter account for posting hurtful images of the Goddess Kali.

Deshwal contended that Atheist Republic’s tweets were highly objectionable and were aimed at demeaning and insulting Hinduism. Atheist Republic has made a “deliberate attempt to wilfully outrage and hurt the religious sentiments of the Hindus to promote religious animosity amongst the people of this country,” Deshwal said. In this hearing he also further sought to ban Atheist Republic’s Twitter account in total.

He also accused Twitter of being an accomplice by allowing Atheist Republic’s post.

Both judges remarked that the issue is about how people feel about the sensitive content. “If these kinds of things were done in relation to another religion, you would be much more careful, more sensitive,” the judges said.

Sidharth Luthra, US Twitter’s senior counsel, who appeared during the hearing, explained that Twitter “cannot block any individual.” Twitter cannot take down content without a court order, Luthra added.

“If this is the logic, then why have you blocked Mr. Trump,” the court countered Luthra.

In 2021, two days after the January 6 attack on the U.S. capitol building, Twitter announced that it permanently suspended ex-president Trump’s account. “We have permanently suspended the account due to the risk of further incitement of violence,” Twitter announced.

Since Twitter “has not questioned the prima facie view of the court with respect to the nature of the content,” Twitter should have “on its own, without waiting for today’s hearing, taken down the posts mentioned by the petitioner as early as December 9, 2021,” the court continued.

The court also challenged Twitter to present their policy behind Trump’s suspension from Twitter, claiming that they should have done the same with the Atheist Republic.

According to Harish Vaidyanathan, a lawyer for India’s central government, a procedure that blocks petitioned Twitter accounts exist. The court eventually prompted the central government to explore blocking Atheist Republic’s Twitter account under the Information Technology Act.

Atheist Republic’s lawyers intervened and argued that the petitioner’s original wish to have the “offending” tweets removed has been fulfilled as they were now blocked to Indian users, so the court should not go forward with banning the Twitter account in total. They also argued that Atheist Republic must be made a party to the proceedings if coercive action will be taken against the organization, and that any blocking by either Twitter or the government of India should only occur after Atheist Republic has been heard in court. Their submissions were taken into account and the intervention was allowed.

The court also ordered Atheist Republic to submit an affidavit, within two weeks, detailing its status, location, presence of any place of business, and authorized representatives in India.

The matter will be heard in court again on Sept. 6, 2022.

Atheist Republic has set up a fundraiser to help cover the cost of the ongoing legal fees. Finding and retaining quality lawyers is not an inexpensive expense, and anything that you can contribute helps our organization immensely.

On March 27th, Atheist Republic had received an email from Twitter Legal which stated “ Twitter has received a court order from the High Court ofDelhi at New Delhi regarding your Twitter account, @AtheistRepublic, that claims [that] content violates the law(s) of India.” Importantly, the email also noted that, “In order to comply with Twitter’s obligations under India’s local laws, we have withheld this content in India; the content remains available elsewhere.” The email also contained a copy of the court order.

On April 1st, the Atheist Republic Twitter account was fully suspended without any formal written notice from Twitter, and no detailing of any community guidelines or terms of service, if any, were violated.

Susanna McIntyre, Atheist Republic’s President & CEO said,

“The judges' comment that ‘If these kinds of things were done in relation to another religion, you would be much more careful, more sensitive’ is laughably false. I interpret this statement to be referring by implication to the religion of Islam, the sensitive nature of blasphemy in that faith, and the risk of violent reaction. This statement implies that we are singling out Hinduism for abuse, and that we are biased in what faiths we blaspheme. This statement could not be further from the truth, and in fact demonstrates the pro-Hindu bias of this judge. If this statement is directed towards Atheist Republic; our organization has been blaspheming against Islam for much longer and in much more “harsh” forms than our blasphemy against Hinduism; including burning and publicly desecrating the Quran as a protest in support of Free Expression. In fact, one of the posts that they ordered to be blocked itself contains an image of Jesus and the Prophet Muhammad kissing on top of a rainbow Kaaba. If this statement is directed toward Twitter; Twitter has consistently allowed blasphemous portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad, including allowing the posting of the notorious Charlie Hebdo cartoons that have resulted in the actual loss of human life. If Twitter did not allow such content on their site, Atheist Republic would ourselves condemn them for such bias. Most importantly, it should be noted that the images that have literally resulted in the death of humans is still publically available on Twitter. The blasphemous content from Atheist Republic that has so offended the petitioners has led to exactly zero physical harm to any person.”

If you like our posts, subscribe to the Atheist Republic newsletter to get exclusive content delivered weekly to your inbox. Also, get the book "Why There is No God" for free.

Click Here to Subscribe

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.