Argument from Motion

182 posts / 0 new
Last post
Nyarlathotep's picture
Here is another way to think
Salman Durrani's picture
But:
Nyarlathotep's picture
skd6348 - But:
Salman Durrani's picture
The difference of two sets
Dave Matson's picture
skd6348:
Salman Durrani's picture
Why isn't their a change in
Nyarlathotep's picture
skd6348 - Why isn't their a
Salman Durrani's picture
I guess what you are saying
Nyarlathotep's picture
Nyarlathotep - If we have a 1
Nyarlathotep's picture
skd6348 - WHAT actual
Salman Durrani's picture
I already hinted to set
Nyarlathotep's picture
skd6348 - I already hinted to
Salman Durrani's picture
Under what definition is it
Nyarlathotep's picture
It is considered actually
Salman Durrani's picture
" Completed " in what sense?
Nyarlathotep's picture
Looks like you are doing
Salman Durrani's picture
Hey... calm down. I just
Nyarlathotep's picture
1)it is complete in that the
Salman Durrani's picture
1) Construction process? As
Nyarlathotep's picture
As far as completeness goes,
Salman Durrani's picture
Let me approach it this way,
Nyarlathotep's picture
skd6348 - Various conceptual
Salman Durrani's picture
But wouldn't that be merely a
Nyarlathotep's picture
skd6348 - But wouldn't that
Salman Durrani's picture
You've Said:
Salman Durrani's picture
Here is a part from a
Salman Durrani's picture
It seems I have to keep
Dave Matson's picture
Nyarlathotep:
Nyarlathotep's picture
Right, what I was trying to
Salman Durrani's picture
I had already defined "I" to

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.