Hello All, I need a honest answering from at least 10 people to settle a question on three scenarios. This will be a very fast thread. No Debate necessary I just need your first gut response.
1) If John Smith says "There is MUCH evidence for the life/death/resurrection of Jesus Christ"
Then is it safe to extrapolate with about 80%+ certainty John concludes that therefore Jesus Christ DOES exist?
2) If John Smith says "There is NO evidence for the life/death/resurrection of Jesus Christ"
Then is it safe to extrapolate with about 80%+ certainty John concludes that therefore Jesus Christ DID NOT exist?
3) ) If John Smith says "There is No evidence to support that Jane Smith is a bad person"
Then is it safe to extrapolate with about 80%+ certainty John concludes that therefore Jane Smith is a Good person?
PLEASE ANSWER SIMPLY
1)YES/NO
2)YES/NO
3)YES/NO
I understand that many things could be meant by these two statements. I understand that if we asked for clarification we would know for sure for both parties. However, I'm just asking that in a normal conversation are these conclusions naturally implied by their initial statements if that is all you have to go off of?
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
