Universal Declaration of Human Rights, states the right to freedom of belief, the problem is that we are as non- believers in any, we are not covered by this state.
Why they just did not provide for the announcement the freedom of non-belief? From my view that the ignored for such point in the announcement of such a right has left a loophole for the enemies of non believers to pursue them and crush them, and possibly executions, the idea could seems silly, but the depth and details in this case needed while dealing with violent people or violate countries to shut the door in there faces as violent groups and countries that hates the atheist and non-belivers.
So do we need as non-beliver for a such announcement?

I am sure the answer is yes, but why?
When you are as non-beliver find that you don't have the for live or to organise any kind of community or groups, also you fon't have the right to be part of political institutions because you are non- beliver to to put your hand on any holy book to repeat the swear of the political position. When you don't have the right to sue the others since you can't promise the court that you will be honest in your case
Actually as non-beliver you don't have any constitutional rights because all constitutions doesn't indicated any states to cover the non-belivers. Ever those was indicated such states are not protect you most times for example the European low protect the Jews even from violence ideas.
But there is no such thing to protect non-belivers.
So if Jews have a very detailed state in the low
That means also non-belivers needs that stats too since the threats that surrounds non-belivers is most dangerous from any other threat for others.

Do you think that we deserve a protection since we find a new country put the atheism on the terrorists list ?