Way to spirit , a human God

24 posts / 0 new
Last post
amir khan's picture
Way to spirit , a human God

There is a book on amazon.com by the name "Way to spirit , a human God - by M. Rashid " it is the most popular book among theists to refute atheism and i think we must need to refute it and debate on that book to disapprove all its points.

Attachments

No

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

Sheldon's picture
amir khan "There is a book

amir khan "There is a book on amazon.com by the name "Way to spirit , a human God - by M. Rashid " it is the most popular book among theists to refute atheism and i think we must need to refute it and debate on that book to disapprove all its points."

I think you mean disprove rather than disapprove, but no we certainly do not. There is no rational requirement to refute the lack of belief in something, only the requirement that any belief is supported by sufficient objective evidence.

What objective evidence does the book demonstrate for any deity?

Incidentally do you feel the need to disprove the existence of invisible fairies or unicorns? This is swindle that religion has used for centuries to falsely set a separate standard for religious beliefs from all others. Open minded unbiased reasoning accepts claims as validated when sufficient objective evidence can be demonstrated to support then, we don't believe claims are valid until they are disproved, as this is the very definition of an argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy. No knowledge is required for disbelief as it is axiomatically our default starting position on all claims.

Cognostic's picture
@amir khan: ANOTHER CLICK

@amir khan: ANOTHER CLICK MINING ASSHOLE I SUSPECT. OBVIOUSLY NOT AN ATHEIST. NO COMPREHENSION AT ALL OF WHAT ATHEISM IS.

NO! We do not need to refute a damn thing. In fact, if M. Rashid has actual empirical evidence for a god, we all need to acknowledge it and stop saying there is no evidence for the existence of a god. Keep the burden of proof were it belongs. The day someone actually comes up with some evidence for the existence of a god, everyone will certainly know about it. It will turn the world upside down and a few Nobel Prizes will be awarded.

ATHEISTS DO NOT NEED TO DEBUNK A DAMN THING. FACTS ARE FACTS AND THEY ARE CAPABLE OF STANDING ON THEIR OWN. EITHER THIS GUY HAS PROVED THE EXISTENCE OF GOD OR HE HAS NOT. IT'S JUST THAT FRIGGING SIMPLE.

Old man shouts at clouds's picture
"The most popular book

"The most popular book amongst theists" lol. Who are you fucking kidding ?

How many copies of this incredibly popular (yet totally unknown) tome have been sold? It must be in the billions to be the most popular amongst the 6 billion theists on the planet ...even the ones who cannot read?

It would probably help if it had an ISBN quoted. Plus it does not appear in Google or any listed bookseller.

Yeh clickbait by an amateur.

Old man shouts at clouds's picture
Oh lordy this is seriously

Oh lordy this is seriously funny here is the author's (yeh the same guy who wrote the OP)
"This book is a complete summarized solution for all human problems such as human depression, witch-craft, modern witchcraft, angelic healing, demonic healing, relationship issues, refutation of atheism by strongest arguments ever and much more.

Snake oil anyone? *laughs until tears run down trouser legs* all in how many pages? *BURSTS INTO LAUGHTER AGAIN*

Oh and the book is FREE! And still can't manage a single genuine review. Oh man, I might just have to read this masterpiece of fiction......

amir khan's picture
here in Canada, every single

here in Canada, every single person is having this book in Toronto, I am tired of seeing people with this book

Old man shouts at clouds's picture
Then quote the ISBN.

Then quote the ISBN.

I just rang my cousin, he lives in Toronto and has never heard of it....are you lying?

Sheldon's picture
amir khan

amir khan

This book seems quite popular on amazon.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Subtle-Art-Not-Giving-Counterintuitive-ebook/dp...

It was the first hit when I searched amazon for the title you gave. The book you are plugging was much lower down the list,, and doesn't have any reviews at all, though it did list the authors name not as M. Rashid, but as Mohammad Rashid khan, oddly the author has the same same surname as the one you are using? As others have pointed out this was not very clever deception. Are you the author or is he a relative perhaps? The kindle price is free, I might download a copy, I would love to see the "refutation of atheism by strongest arguments ever and much more.".

Nyarlathotep's picture
Sounds like guerilla

Sounds like guerilla marketing.

Old man shouts at clouds's picture
@Nyar

@Nyar

Sounds more like absolute desperation.....jeez no self respecting guerilla could be that hopeless. He would be dead.

Randomhero1982's picture
Even if there was indeed a

Even if there was indeed a book, it wouldn't need debating in order to stop any potential harm to an atheistic world view.

As long as our mentally defective counterparts continue to fail to demonstrate a single shred of demonstrable and empirical evidence, there is nothing to discuss really.

Old man shouts at clouds's picture
I have now read these

I have now read these disconnected hysterical ramblings. All 55 pages of drivel and self promotion.

The short (they are all short) chapter on Atheism is , well, infantile, ill educated and to give you a flavor of it, demands that an ape be brought in front of the author so that "atheist" can make it turn into a man. *sigh*

Still the whole thing is a good belly laugh for me and Captain Cat. A 45 minute read of badly constructed, almost zero punctuation bold type infantile idiocy.

Anyhoo, mods the OP is one and the same as the author.

RULE 12: No advertising or self-promotion

LostLocke's picture
No way I was going to read

No way I was going to read this whole book-type thing, but I decided to just give the "Look Inside" a little go.
The first, literally first sentence I read was, "God neither sleeps nor feels tired thus a person who sleeps less and works more is more intelligent and has a higher degree of awareness."

Yeah, right out of the gate he's got something very wrong.
So, last and only sentence I needed to read.

Tin-Man's picture
@LostLocke Re : "The first,

@LostLocke Re : "The first, literally first sentence I read was, "God neither sleeps nor feels tired..."

Which begs the obvious question: Why did god have to rest on the seventh day after creating the universe?

Hey, OP writer! Any explanation(s)?

Nyarlathotep's picture
Their all powerful unchanging

Because their all powerful unchanging deity; changed because he somehow exhausted himself?

Algebe's picture
@Tin-Man: Why did god have to

@Tin-Man: Why did god have to rest on the seventh day after creating the universe?

God's a union man. He knows his rights. And the health and safety department would be on his case if he worked non-stop for seven days.

Sheldon's picture
"God neither sleeps nor feels

"God neither sleeps nor feels tired "

Oddly the author has disagreed with the bible in the very first sentence of his book then.

"Genesis 2:2-3 New King James Version (NKJV)

2 And on the seventh day God ended His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done."

Why on earth would a deity that never feels tired, rest? Come to that why on earth would a being with limitless power need rest anyway.

LogicFTW's picture
It particularly cracks me up

It particularly cracks me up when bible apologist try to explain that a "day" is subjective and does not really mean a "day" as everyone born in the last 200,000 + years know a "day" as.

If the term "day'" must be taken as highly subjective, and not literally in the bible, what can we take as objective? Any word in the bible? Any word in the bible at all that should be taken literally, as the word definition implies? Yes, no? How do we know what parts of the book are supposed to be story time where the very words have alternative meanings? Why read the bible as anything other then 2000+ year old fiction heavily plagiarized from other religion ideas?

Why can't people read genesis and go: "yep, its all 2000 year old bull shit," 10 seconds into reading genesis? Instead people think it is the word of some great highly intelligent being? I know 9 year olds today that could write a more coherent book.

Why are people not embarrassed admitting they believe that book as nonfiction?

cranky47's picture
I thought Elvis had left the

I thought Elvis had left the building?

CyberLN's picture
Yes, he has done so.

Yes, he has done so.

Tin-Man's picture
@Cyber Re: "Yes, he has done

@Cyber Re: "Yes, he has done so."

What??? The Khan dude is gone already?... *shoulders slumping*... Aw, dang-it. I just bought a copy of his book and was gonna ask him to autograph it for me. Oh, well... *shrugging shoulders*... I just hope we don't feel his wrath one day.

Attachments

Attach Image/Video?: 

Yes
Sheldon's picture
Mon, 12/30/2019

Mon, 12/30/2019
cranky47 "I thought Elvis had left the building?"

I just saw Elvis, down the chippy, he's alive and well, and like all instances of reincarnation had absolutely nothing cogent to say about his experiences.

Also, the price of chips is just shocking.

cranky47's picture
"Also, the price of chips is

"Also, the price of chips is just shocking."

I'll say. Here in Oz, my local greasy spoon charges $8.50 for a smallish piece of flake (shark) and a hand full of chips. Well cooked and won't usually give you food poisoning . (I hate soggy chips)

Sheldon's picture
@cranky47

@cranky47

I agree about soggy chips, unconscionable.

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.