Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (mankind is one likely type)

119 posts / 0 new
Last post
Nyarlathotep's picture
Using just one entry from the
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Such is the only expression
Kataclismic's picture
Moore's law is actually
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
It appears you have failed to
Kataclismic's picture
The fact that you continually
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Kataclismic Stipulation:
ThePragmatic's picture
@ ProgrammingGodJordan
chefu's picture
One doesn't need faith to
chefu's picture
SCIENCE 101
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
('A')
Nyarlathotep's picture
ProgrammingGodJordan - [ix]
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
I am unable to parse said
Nyarlathotep's picture
ProgrammingGodJordan -->
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
('A')
Nyarlathotep's picture
No matter how many sites you
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
('A')
Dave Matson's picture
Nyarlathotep,
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
(1)
Nyarlathotep's picture
That is an interesting term:
Dave Matson's picture
Thanks, Nyarlathotep! Being
chefu's picture
The fallacy of Proving Too
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Nonsense, for such (manner of
ThePragmatic's picture
Why do I keep hearing

Attachments

Attach Image/Video?: 

Yes
chefu's picture
Simply, one shan't misapply
Nyarlathotep's picture
Consider the value of:
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
I had long demonstrated the
Nyarlathotep's picture
In the time you took to write
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
See the thing is, a lemma is
Nyarlathotep's picture
Sorry no. In mathematics a
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Sorry no. In mathematics a

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.