Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon

19 posts / 0 new
Last post
Atheist Republic's picture
Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon
Breaking the Spell

Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon

View on Amazon  View on iTunes

This book is Daniel Dennet's purely scientific take on religion. Dennet, a cognitive scientist and a philosopher, contends that a scientific analysis of religion could actually help predict the future of the phenomenon.

Innovative thinkers question the reason behind most people’s belief in a god, and how religion influences and shapes lives. This is apparent in how religion is an integral part of marriage, raising children and social structure.

In a bold move, Dennett takes a closer look at the phenomenon and asks the big question: "Why?". He tackled questions such as the following: Where does devotion to a supreme being come from and what do we get out of it? Is religion brought by an evolutionary compulsion or is it a coherent choice? In Breaking the Spell, Dennett implies that he intends to come up with a solution to not to break faith but to break the belief that religion should not be subjected to scientific inquiry.

The book features a vigorous narrative that ranges from history, philosophy and psychology, where the author discusses how organized religion has developed from folk beliefs, into the potent force that it is now. He argues that this "belief in belief" has actually blurred man's attempt to sensibly consider the existence of God, as well as the dynamics of divinity and human needs. The author makes it clear that book is not really anti-religious. It is merely an exploration of how religious belief affects our lives, our relationships, the community and even mankind as a whole.

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

Zaphod's picture
I personally would like to
SammyShazaam's picture
That's a really interesting
Zaphod's picture
I do think it can apply in
SammyShazaam's picture
Good point there. Humans do
Zaphod's picture
While I do think a little
Keith Raye's picture
Your argument is an
Zaphod's picture
I am surprised Natureman has
efpierce's picture
"A boring book that mostly
Zaphod's picture
Yeah, I feel $12 is
mattyn's picture
I have read this book and
Zaphod's picture
I hear that! Was this book
mattyn's picture
Yes it is. Some parts of the
efpierce's picture
I broke down and bought the
firebolt's picture
Belief in belief, what an odd
efpierce's picture
It's better than basing a
Fizicks's picture
I know i'm late to these but
bigbill's picture
I read portions of the book,
Keith Raye's picture
Indeed. Religious beliefs are

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.