AI vs Religion
Donating = Loving
Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.
Log in or create an account to join the discussions on the Atheist Republic forums.
- Correction, 'Some' have complained that they are complex, Others notice those that are peer reviewed and others that are simply 'in the works' so to speak.
- As a result, You continuously spam your personal opinions which rest on unfounded papers.
Such as your thought experiment that requires supersymmetry, which we've all mentioned millions of times, has no evidence to support it.
1.) On the contrary, history shows that you have wrongly injected your opinions several times (Wherein you mistook your opinions as valid evidence, and my objective expressions as invalid evidence). You appeared to recently come to know the difference between the teleological argument, and teleology in biology. (In a recent thread where we largely exchanged words)
In simpler terms, you strongly expressed your opinions/subjective feelings, contrary to purpose in the regime of objectivity.
1.b) Reference: Scenario where you blathered on contrary to purpose in the realm of objectivity.
2.) It is no surprise that people without PhD's or Masters will find my model strange. However, from my interactions, professors or PhD holders, tend to find my model straight forward/sensible.
3.) Sample discussions with PhD Holders:
A fun exchange between myself and Garret Lisi (PHd theoretical physicist, inventor of E8 theory, a grand unified theory of everything) wrt my "Supersymmetric Artificial Neural Network": https://imgur.com/X6eZ5FC.png
A discussion about my "Supersymmetric Artificial Neural Network", with PHd computer scientist Eray, on a public facebook board. (Eray is winner of 2015 Kurzweil Idea Awards, for his contributions to universal induction): See the first post regarding the "Supersymmetric Artificial Neural Network" on this facebook discussion.
"2.) It is no surprise that people without PhD's or Masters will find my model strange. However, from my interactions, professors or PhD holders, tend to find my model straight forward/sensible."
Argument from authority. One after another, you're on a roll.
This is something I too have tried to point out on occasions, a proverbial fallacy marry-go-round.
And edit's to suit his narrative, which renders me uninterested in further dialogue.
It would also include him, then, as he is without a PhD or Masters.
Indeed, This is what I find amusing.
But perhaps English isn't his first language?!
It's ironic too, that like supersymmetry, he cannot see the parallels.
Where does my hypothesis supposedly require Supersymmetry?
1.) Is English your first language?
2.) Note that I didn't say that all beings absent PhD or masters don't disregard my model. In English, we use qualifiers such as "all" to classify stuff.
"Note that I didn't say that all beings absent PhD or masters don't disregard my model. In English, we use qualifiers such as "all" to classify stuff."
You didn't say some either, so the error was yours by being vague.
"It is no surprise that people without PhD's or Masters will find my model strange."
In English we use qualifiers such as "some" to classify you don't mean all, and are not simply being lazy or illiterate.
Enlighten me, please. How would what you wrote exclude you? Be specific.
“In English, we use qualifiers such as “all” to classify stuff.” Did you use a qualifier in the sentence we are discussing?
Is the word ‘stuff’ some sort of technical term?
On the contrary:
1.) You can contact Garret Lisi to confirm our exchange.
2.) You can clearly see that the Facebook discussion with Eray is unedited. (I can't edit his responses)
On the contrary, I specifically listed a few persons that don't disregard my model. (with PhD's). Is English your first language Sheldon?
@ProgrammingGodJordan, since you keep asking people if English is their first language (btw it is not mine, I warn you so you don't need to ask), when reading your posts I'm tempted to ask... Is any human language your first? As you can tell by the multiple negative comments about your muddled posts, that people cannot follow your thoughts (and this forum is full of brilliant women and men) and you keep commiting fallacy after fallacy... You're not interested in explaining your point of view, but to prove to yourself how smart you are... It's very boring to read you.
(Edited for clarity)
Touché
Did you know: PGJ goes back and edits his posts. Towards what ends you ask? Believe it or not, he removes places where he has been candid, and replaces them with extremely obscure language. I won't guess at his motives for doing so. But it leaves us with the situation: the longer a post of his has been up, the more obscure it seems.
@Nyar Re: "...the longer a post of his (PGJ) has been up, the more obscure it seems."
*cue The Twilight Zone music*
This is something I have attempted to point out on numerous occasions, I am glad someone else caught wind of it.
You don't need all knowledge to know that gods are man-made superstitions invented by different cultures, living on different continents across different periods of time and whose fairytales were isolated to their geographic locations for more than 1500 years until the Age of Exploration began.
If only that were true, alas it continues to have its strangle hold on various populations.
1.) It looks like many of them don't study machine learning, if my posts mostly supposedly appear "muddled".
2.) As I said before, people with PhDs or masters in relevant fields have been observed to recognize my expressions as straightforward/sensible.
3.) Ironically, I am the only being here that tends to present expressions as organized, quickly digestable bullet points.
I tend to remove typos. (You may detect this if you compare a quotation of my words by others with the edited stuff)
1.) Come, that you don't understand a topic, does not suddenly warrant that data in said topic terms is fallacious. In fact, your action above is probably fallacious.
2.) As per my invention "non-beliefism ", I don't subscribe to fallacy. Perhaps you need to reevaluate you're position.
PGJ, where did I say “and you keep commiting fallacy after fallacy”?
“Perhaps you need to reevaluate you’re (sic) position” that I wrote it.
Pgj said: " In fact, your action above is probably fallacious."
What the hell does "probably fallacious" mean? It either is or it isn't. Are you not sure? Do you know where CyberLN was being fallacious... Do tell...but... Wasn't that flamenca who said that? Do you know what a logical fallacy is?
You called yourself a "being" in your response to Flamenca. Are you not a human? Why do you use that word instead of person?
Again with the argument from authority too... (Look it up).
Quite literally the stupidest thing I have read on here yet.
1.) I tend to call people beings.
2.) Refer to item 6 in the following url: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/being
STOP THE PRESSES!!! I think I just figured it out, everybody! It is so obvious it is no wonder we all missed it!....
Our ol' buddy PGJ is actually a prototype AI program that has logged in to the AR to interact with humans and learn social skills. Wow... It all makes sense now. We really need to help him with his etiquette and sense of humor. Just think.... We could all currently be a part of helping the first AI being assimilate into society. Awesome!
Cyberdyne Systems Model 01000011 01101111 01100011 01101011.
(I'll allow you to translate the binary code)
@Random
67. 111. 99. 107. Is it suppose to be random, Random?
@Random
Aw, shit. Disregard. I got it! LMAO!!!
Pages