Jesus heals the Sick

47 posts / 0 new
Last post
CyberLN's picture
And you, chuckster, cannot

And you, chuckster, cannot prove that you are not one of them.

Chuck Rogers's picture
Well I know the truth wether

Well I know the truth wether you believe me or not. I know what God has done for me when I got saved and what He has since I have been saved.
And I hope many more will come to know it.

CyberLN's picture
It's not the truth, chuckster

It's not the truth, chuckster. Your gawd has done have. There is simply no gawd external to that which you have created in your own mind. You have provided zero proof of the existence of your gawd.

Now, tell me what your purpose is for posting in the forum?

Lmale's picture
Chicky whats so special about

Chicky whats so special about you that god heard your prayer but ignored BILLIONS of other prayers.
Your arrogant you lie more than a politician and your pretty dumb. Your nobody theres nothing about you that would make anyone believe god would heal you of a little non life threatening pain while letting hundreds of millions of people die horribly every year. In the time its taken you to read this post your gawd has let thousands die.

Jeff Vella Leone's picture
Yea I do not read anything by

Yea I do not read anything by chuck and some others, I see the name and skip.

You cannot reason with stupid people.

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”
― Albert Einstein

Lmale's picture
Gotta love Einstein he had a

Gotta love Einstein he had a wicked sense of humour.

Clockwork's picture
Jeff, I'm starting to see why

Jeff, I'm starting to see why. It's like trying to debate those toy parrots that just repeat the same phrases.

Chuck Rogers's picture

Gregypek claims that theists just keep going back to old books in which Atheists claim that man wrote, for our answers. Even if that were true, which it's not, you all do the same thing. But that's ok for you all huh. You read others writings of which we absolutely know was written by man, and accept it as truth when you don't even know there mind to know what their agenda is, or if they lied to get their point across. But that's ok for you.
And again if you read, or watch, or listen to those people you would realize that the majority of them say "we believe, or it's our theory". Look it up for yourself, you don't have to take my word for it. But I have yet to see anyone do that, and everyone keeps dodging that. Why are you afraid to admit it. Maybe your afraid of the questions it will cause you to ask yourself. Maybe it could interfere with your sins.

Lmale's picture
Not that fucking just a

Not that fucking just a theory bullshit again come on the scientific definition of theory has be patiently explained to you mr 'ex atheist'
You were even informed of the scientific method and of peer review all designed to catch liars or mistakes. Funny thing creationists dont produce peer reviewed papers because they know they will be caught out they simply spread bullshit about evolution and confuse it on purpose with abiogenesis.
They write books make videos because anyone can write a book or do a video BUT no peer reviewed papers.
Thats partly why creationism cannot become a theory without peer review its not really science.
Funny thing here you dont see christians up in arms about every other science no just the ones that proved them wrong are a 'conspiracy' every other branch or theory in science is fine.
Everything in science goes through the same process to become a theory so if evolution is untrustworthy ALL science is untrustworthy but you only claim the bits you dont like are untrustworthy shame on you for lying go apologise to jebus.

Chuck Rogers's picture
Oh how smart you are you've

Oh how smart you are you've got it all figured out, NOT. We like science very much, but evolutionists like to put lies in their writings. For one thing the so called layers theory doesn't exist in the world only in text books and in museums. I've told you before that fossils and layers is circular dating.
Why is it that the first so called Neanderthal that was made up by some guy from one tooth, (this guy should work for the F.B.I.) in which it was proven later to be a pig's tooth? They still use it in text books. Why? Susie's human knee cap was found a half mile away from the skull, but it has to be hers huh. And that's real science huh? I guess in your mind it is. By the way I think it was you that said a Christian said that if science proves God to be false, he would deny the science. Well for one thing that says that science hasn't proved God wrong as you keep claiming it has. For another just because He said that doesn't mean everyone else does. Myself, I don't believe anyone will ever be able to prove God doesn't exist with science because He is the one that made science possible. He even tells us in His word to examine things, ie science.

Oh yeah Lmale it's nice to be talking to you again. I knew you couldn't stay away lol.

Lmale's picture
There is no layers theory it

There is no layers theory it was an ad hoc example. Scientists dont date fossils on what layer they were in but you have demonstraded an inability to understand the dating methods used so i offered an example i believed you would be able to comprehend, since you got it wrong i must apologise for overestimating your ability.
As for your an entire neandeethal species from one tooth bullshit i suggest you go to this website:
Once again go to biologos a CHRISTIAN website that supports evolution you cannot claim all evolutionists are atheist thats a LIE and dont you have a rule about not lying.
Since many christian scientists agree with evolution you cannot claim its an atheist conspiracy.

Chuck Rogers's picture

I went to the link, I found it to be quite amusing. remember "a" before a word means, it's the opposite of.
Were did they get these teeth I wonder. And what proof do they have that they are as old as they say are? Also they give a very large amount of time to claim they may have belonged to. I have some info below on transitional fossils with info on were they came from. But first I will respond to your accusation that I lied about all evolutionists are Atheist.
I don't recall making that statement. I may have said or made an accusation that all Atheists are evolutionists. But I know that some so called Christians claim evolution, but though my first question would be "are they really a Christian, or are they just believing what someone else has lied to them about. Nevertheless it doesn't matter who believes in evolution, belief doesn't make it a fact, nor does the amount of people that believe it make it true!!!!!
Now here is some info you should consider before believing everything you hear from evolutionists.

Lazarus Taxa
Sometimes called "Lazarus taxa," living fossils are organisms that were thought to be extinct, only to turn up alive in modern populations. Ranging from magnolia flowers to gar fish, and from single-cell algal filaments to lobsters, the living counterpart looks so much like its fossilized predecessors that identification down to the species level is often possible.
One of the most spectacular living fossils is the coelacanth, a lobe-finned fish. Once known only from fossilized remains, this fish was considered by many to be a key transitional form ("missing link") between fish and amphibians. Its fossils are found in Devonian strata, which are assigned a stunningly vast age of 400 million years. However, a live coelacanth hauled up in a fishing net off Madagascar in 1938 showed the same well-designed form as the fossils. It uses its unique fins to orient itself vertically in the deepest seas of the Indian Ocean, not for "walking" onto land from shallow waters. Where is any evidence of natural selection having made even one significant change in this fish over its supposed 400-million-year existence? A similar question could be asked of a host of living fossils.
The most straightforward explanation for why the living form looks so much like the fossilized one is that instead of eons of evolution having taken place, both were created recently.

From the seafloor off New Caledonia comes a strange colonial creature that was supposed to have been extinct for 300 million years.
In 1992 Noel Dilly, sorting through a pile of unlovely organisms retrieved by French oceanographers from the seafloor off New Caledonia, found himself looking at a graptolite: a strange sea creature last seen alive around 300 million years ago.

Piltdown Man
The claim: 500,000 year old intermediate link
New York Times ran an article: "Darwin Theory Proved True."
Found in a gravel pit in Sussex England in 1912. It was found to be a complete forgery 41 years later. The skull was found to be of modern age. The fragments had been chemically stained to give the appearance of age, and the teeth had been filed down.

The claim: 14 million year old intermediate between ape-like creatures and humans

"Ramapithicus is ideally structured to be an ancestor of hominids. If he isn't, we don't have anything else that is." Time Magazine (Nov. 7, 1977)

The truth: In 1970 a baboon living in Ethiopia was discovered.
It had the same dental structure
It had similar morphological features that were found on Ramapithecus
Ramapithecus was dropped from human line


Fake Dinosaur-bird ancestor
The most recent and perhaps the most infamous evolution frauds was committed in China and published in 1999 in the journal National Geographic 196:98-107, November 1999. Dinosaur bones were put together with the bones of a newer species of bird and they tried to pass it off as a very important new evolutionary intermediate.

"Feathers For T-Rex?", Christopher P. Sloan, National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 196, No. 5, November, 1999, pp.99, 100, 105

Interesting Quote - "National Geographic has reached an all-time low for engaging in sensationalistic, unsubstantiated, tabloid journalism" Storrs L. Olson, Smithsonian Institution

Even the discovery of a living dinosaur would have been less surprising. Because fossils show that the coelacanth existed 150-200 million years before the appearance of the dinosaurs. The creature put forward by many scientists as the ancestor of land-dwelling vertebrates, believed to have disappeared at least 70 million years ago, had been found!
These words from a Darwinist, in the April 2003 issue of Focus magazine, describe the astonishment at the discovery of a living Coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae), for years portrayed as a transitional form, in today’s waters. Prior to 1938, Darwinists had made countless claims about the fossil Coelacanth, interpreting its fins as "legs about to start walking" and a fossilized oil sac as "a primitive lung." With all this speculation about the fossil, they suggested that they had discovered a missing link.
The capture of a living Coelacanth at such a time came as a terrible disappointment to Darwinists. This and more than 200 other living Coelacanths, the latest of which was caught in May 2007, totally discredited all the Darwinist conjecture about the fossils. It was realized that the Coelacanth was an exceedingly complex and highly developed bottom-dwelling fish, about 150 cm in length. In addition, the animals showed no sign of change over 450 million years. To put it another way, its complexity today is the same as it was 450 million years in the past.

Was discovered in 1974
About 40% of the fossil was found
Claimed to be 3.5 million years old
Claimed to be bipedal (walked upright)

"I noticed that the ribs were more round in cross-section, more like what you see in apes. Human ribs are flatter in cross-section. But the shape of the rib cage itself was the biggest surprise of all. The human rib cage is barrel shaped, and I just couldn't get Lucy's ribs to fit this kind of shape."
Peter Schmid (paleontologist at the Anthropological Institute in Zurich) Quoted from Origins reconsidered: In Search of What Makes Us Human by Richard Leakey and Roger Lewin
"The australopithecines known over the last several decades ... are now irrevocably removed from a place in the evolution of human bipedalism, ..."
Charles Oxnard (professor of anatomy and leading expert on australopithecine fossils), The Order of Man: A Biomathematical Anatomy of the Primates, 1984, p. 332
Dr. Barney Maddox, the leading genetic Genome researcher, said concerning the genetic differences, "Now the genetic difference between human and the his nearest relative, the chimpanzee, is at least 1.6%. That doesn't sound like much, but calculated out, that is a gap of at least 48,000,000 nucleotides, and a change of only 3 nucleotides is fatal to the animal; there is no possibility of change."
Human Genome Project, Quantitative a Disproof of Evolution, CEM Facts Sheets. Cited in Doubts about Evolution?

Nearly all experts agree Lucy was a 3 foot tall chimpanzee.

I have more if you want to read them

Chuck Rogers's picture
Lmale buddy, have you read my

Lmale buddy, have you read my last post?

Timetrooper2099's picture
Here goes the typical

Here goes the typical religious nut saying that prayer saved them and made them all better. To start off we don't know what you had, was it the flu or a cold or a runny nose. So you had too choices you where eventually going to get better or die. Most people get better time heals most ailments. If you got time to pray then time is going by, hence the healing process has already started. Enough about your runny nose.

Now the claims that jesus heals or healed anyone is in a book that was written by man many years after the fact and then was translated in a many languages. By scribes who tried to make sense of the crazy unbelievable stories. Most holly texts ( stories by men) where not even put into the bible even the religious thought they where to unbelievable to be part of the great book. Jesus didn't heal anyone with a missing leg or lepers of a real disease. In fact jesus didn't even tell people to wash there hands because he didn't know about micro germs or bacteria. Great god you have there I'm glad your cold is better but that isn't your worse problem. You are delusional better have that looked at, or prayed about .

watchman's picture
rightaid ...

rightaid ...

Of course its possible ....
any poster may be ..... what is it you say ? .... "goofing on us"

"goofing" .... odd choice of word

Chuck Rogers's picture

Did you research Hermeneutics yet?


Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.