Word "Devine Intelligence" does not has the same meaning as in Abrahamic religions.
In this video we uncover 5 profound Truths about the Law of Karma, which are not commonly understood:
1. The Law of Karma is NOT an eye-for-an-eye type of petty justice.
2. There is a divine intelligence that governs and guides the law of karma.
3. This divine intelligence keeps a constant watch over all our deeds good and bad. What the identity of this mysterious divine intelligence is, the answer is unveiled in this video…
4. Simultaneously we also discover the precise mechanism by which karmic justice is dispensed and,
5. Lastly, we find the profound spiritual goal that drives the law of karma.
I am unable to embed this youtube link into the site. I am using google chrome. Can someone help?
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
*cough* *Cough*..."Bullshit" ........
some evidence to accompany this juicy selection of outlandish claims would be nice....
You commented so early (within 1 min of posting) that you can not watch the video. Such a rush by atheists who claim to be thinking community; this show your inclination towards dogma not thinking. The aim of this video is not to show something but tell what you don't know.
And you must think I am fucking stupid not to recognise self promotion clickbait when I see it.
RE: 1. The Law of Karma is NOT an eye-for-an-eye type of petty justice.
Well, thank you for sharing. I assume it is also not an elephant, not mushrooms, and certainly not the echo chamber between your ears.
We could also say your are not an asshole wasting our time with woo woo bullshit. When you figure out what it is.... why not come back and try again.
RE: 2. There is a divine intelligence that governs and guides the law of karma.
You just aren't very good at this thinking thing are you. There is a divine gap of intelligence in your ability to express yourself clearly with out woowoo speak. You have not defined Karma and already you are on to something divine. Ice cream is divine. I think I will have a bowl.
RE: Can someone help? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA So much for divine consciousness. * I JUST FIGURE THIS ONE OUT * All the knowledge in the world about divine consciousness can not help you embed a YouTube link on an internet chat site." HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA......
This troll is not actually hanging around and saying anything. He is just trying to get hits on his YouTube channel. He makes the assertion, asserts it is explained on his Chanel and then sits back and waits for his click meter to rise. THIS IS ALL BULLSHIT. HE IS A TROLL AND HE IS ADVERTISING HIS YOUTUBE BULLSHIT.
'Law of karma'
Yes I remember, that's up there with Einstein's theory of general bad luck.
E=MC*b (b=bollocks)
Give your head a wobble ya silly fucker.... law of karma... bloody hell!
1. The Law of Karma is NOT an eye-for-an-eye type of petty justice.
The entire sentence is an "Equivocation Fallacy." It asserts the word "law" as though it could be equated with a "scientific law."
"A law in science is a generalized rule to explain a body of observations in the form of a verbal or mathematical statement. Scientific laws (also known as natural laws) imply a cause and effect between the observed elements and must always apply under the same conditions." There is absolutely nothing like "LAW" in the idea of Karma. Finally, telling me what Karma is NOT, says nothing at all about what it is. You may as well state that the first law of Karma is; "1. Karma is not a box of Cheetos." This is every bit as true as the first 'LAW" you have stated.
2. There is a divine intelligence that governs and guides the law of karma.
The above statement is nothing more than an erroneous assertion without facts or evidence to back it up. Also, Keep in mind that we have not yet defined Karma. All the OP has done is said that "Karma is not.... We have no demonstration of divine intelligence anywhere and a significant lack of intelligence demonstrated in the original post as is evidenced by the complete lack of evidence provided.
3. This divine intelligence keeps a constant watch over all our deeds good and bad. What the identity of this mysterious divine intelligence is, the answer is unveiled in this video…
Now the OP doubles down; without defining "Divine Intelligence" or "Karma" he professes knowledge about both. Divine intelligence is watching me..... woooo wooooo. He calls it "Mysterious" as if that means anything at all. (Watch the video - Click Bait! An effort to raise his views on YouTube. Complete and Utter BULLSHIT!)
4. Simultaneously we also discover the precise mechanism by which karmic justice is dispensed and,
"We all?" WTF? Now this "Karma" thing, which we have not yet defined, has a precise mechanism, which we have also not defined, by which is dispenses (Karma dispenses Justice? Really? That is the function of Karma? So.... It's not a natural law. It is an agent of Justice dispensement?) One of us is confused and I suspect it is not actually me.
5. Lastly, we find the profound spiritual goal that drives the law of karma.
Now Karma, which we have not defined, has a spiritual (I'm betting you will not define "spiritual" either.) goal. So Karma itself is an active agent seeking a specific outcome. I'm sorry... What is profound in this? Apparently there is a "Profound Spiritual Goal" not stated or defined in any way, for which Karma, also not yet defined, is responsible for.
WELL FUCK - SIGN ME UP - IT ALL MAKES PERFECT SENSE TO ME - Karma: invisible, tasteless, cotton candy for the mind.
2 cents
Karma is a basic belief in both Hinduism and Buddhism .What's his name has given his own understanding , which seems a bit dogmatic . There are many more explanations , from the Theosophists simplistic view to an atheistic buddhist explanation, and lots in between.
However, they are all woo as far as I'm concerned. IE lots of claims, no proof.