**RE: I'm guessing you are lying.
__

No, this may be a "belief" you hold.

I am not one person: I am part of a team. I will not submit anything that does not have a real proof of concept: the proof exists and satisfies the condition(s):

i. Macro- and micro-cosmic implications/applications (ie. applicable to any/all scales)
ii. Tries "belief"-in-and-of-itself as a viable basis upon which to construct *any* 'state'
iii. Necessarily establishes a framework that tends towards whatever "object" is placed behind a/the falsification wall
iv. Can not itself be falsified

It is three structures; latter two are as an infinity symbol (8):

(Head) Body of Negation: Any/all attempts to FALSIFY anything passed up by either:

{(Shoulder) Body of Inquiry: to test any/all "belief"-based assertion(s) for known ignorance(s)..}
{(Shoulder) Body of Trial: to try any/all "belief"-based assertion(s) for known ignorance(s)........}

This 'structure' ensures that whatever is left over after indefinite trial/testing is whatever is true: else having been falsified.

It works both individually and as a 'state' which tends towards peace, peace and more peace. This is how I know it is certainly possible for there to be world peace: a model exists which would certainly tend towards it.

**RE: Since there is no atheist dogma, and atheism is concerned with just ONE question (acceptance of the assertion that god(s) exist), you, it seems, are incorrect that *atheism* is just another religion.
___

Yes there is an atheist dogma: to "believe" there is not a god/deity on the basis of "believing" there being no evidence for one.

Again:
call the universe "that"
call any being "I" in/of "that"
can "that" be inferred by "I" if the latter is *unknown* unto itself?

So "know thy self" is the first fundamental knowledge needed to ever infer a higher intelligence (which there is). That does not necessarily imply god, but atheists dogmatically shut down the notion that there is something beyond themselves, which is ignorant. An all-knowing god *can* be tested for. If the atheist can not figure this out, it is due to their own not knowing themselves.

Either theist or atheist: both in the same boat. Believing to know something they know not.

Atheism is just another religion - but closer to the truth than "belief"-based theism. Atheists can be just as retarded as theists (as seen here on these forums).
____

**RE: That being said, there surely are folks who identify as atheist who treat it very much like a religion. However, it seems you fail to recognize that is an individual making atheism a personal ideology rather than it being an ideology in and of itself.
__

It is an ideology: severance of pursuit. Atheism will go nowhere because rather than advancing an alternative (as I am) their entire platform is structured on the *rejection of* another ideology. Where are the atheists who are advancing a worldview that establishes an actual 'state'... considering AR is now (apparently) a political 'state'? What is the platform? ...rejection of another?

It's nonsense and atheism is just as stagnated as any other ideology.
____

**RE: Personally, I take offense at being lumped in with a wad of other people based on the lumper’s misconceptions.
__

Lol. You must not know that taking offense is *not* a virtue: it is a sign that a person is insecure and/or identified with something that they are not. Otherwise, no offense. Please try your own misconceptions before trying others'.
____

**RE: As far as atheism being close to the truth, as you say was your previous view, it’s nothing of the sort. It is simply the non-acceptance of ONE assertion. Perhaps that is where your line of thinking began to lead you down this rather odd path.
__

...the non-acceptance of any assertion is closer to the truth by way of negation, which leaves only what can not be falsified (ie. tending to be true). Atheism consciously justifies the negation for "belief" in a god, which is well and good (more correct than theism) but that does not mean it comes not without dogmas of its own, which it does.
____

**RE: This has all been explained to you by many posters in many ways here at AR. That you seem to actively and purposefully refuse to comprehend that message indicates, at least to me, a rather high level of childishness. Is that really what you want to present to the World Wide Web?
__

Nothing has been explained to me in the way of a conscious justification: I have not had one consciously justified contention with anything that is not rhetorical - let alone a falsification. The problem is the atheists here are focusing on people rather than ideas (which makes it a religion in-and-of-itself), and the only reason I can see for them attacking me is... they can not refute them and perhaps don't like people who think for themselves. That makes *them* childish. I'm willing to focus 100% attention on the problem of "from whence any/all human suffering" as I do anyways, but these atheists care more about attacking me than the same, which again, makes them not only childish but pathetic (ie. pathology of attacking people rather than focusing on the needs of others).

So forgive my unwillingness to concede that atheism is *not* a religion: the people here are just as religious as any for constantly focusing on people behind ideas rather than ideas themselves. All this, after explicitly telling everyone I know I am nothing.

How does something come from nothing? Ignorant people "believe" something is while being not. Say hello to the illusion of creation (ie. maya) wherein whoever is manifest is suffering their own ignorance "believing" it is someone else's. This is where projection comes from: blaming others for ones own iniquities and is the first sin of the Edenic story of Adam and Eve.

Ps. I am testing it, and so far: IT HOLDS.
Blame/scapegoating=original sin (ie. Adam)
Then not listening to the warning *not* to blame/scapegoat is the second (ie. Eve)
Begets Kain: enmity and desire to attack. <-*this is where theists/atheists are both pooled and joined.
Holds, holds and holds. There is *no* difference between a theist/atheist who attacks others.