UPDATED: image of LORI
https://ibb.co/090gbJ2

I have constructed a thought experiment demonstrating that "BELIEF"-in-and-of-itself is the root of any/all IGNORANCE/SUFFERING. If followed and understood, it will highlight the POI (point of entry) whence any/all human suffering (as to be found: due to "BELIEF"-based ignorance). This should be welcomed news for atheists that do not "BELIEVE" in any god/deity.

It challenges the philosophical assertion:

"All knowing is belief, but not all belief is knowing."

The Relative Intra-Inference Problem (TRIIP)
-------------------------------
Begin with nothingness.
Let any universe exist - if so willing, use the existing one. Designate it as 'that'.
Let any being 'I' exist in/of 'that'.

If:
'that' is absolutely *unknown*, and
if 'I' is also *unknown* unto/by itself (hence: I?)
it can *not* be inferred by 'I?'
So:
LAW of RELATIVE-RECIPROCAL INFERENCE (LORI): one can not infer an *unknown* from/by another *unknown*.

Two options:
1. 'I' becomes *known* to infer 'that', or (and thus)
2. 'that' becomes *known* to infer 'I' (ad infinitum) until both are fully *known* (whichever comes first).
LORI: if/when any *unknown* is assigned a characteristic(s), it can be used to (try to) infer the other (and vice versa).

Now:
Let the being 'I?' remain *unknown*.
Let 'that' remain *unknown* less a fixed arbitrary Primordial Dichotomous Dipole
(ie. yang/yin, good/evil, light/dark, right/wrong etc.)
and designate simply as (8) to highlight the two polarities.

'I?'8

Now TRY:
(8) as GOOD/EVIL using LORI:

definition needed: SATAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***WORD MEANING: SATAN***
The Hebrew root S-T-N (satan) renders thus:
shin: psychology/emotions/actions (in/as one conjunct expression)
tet: bind; enclosure (being bound to/by)
nun (final): indefinitely (ongoing state)

"Any/all expression(s) of being indefinitely BOUND (ie. to "believe" in/of something unreal and/or untrue)."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now TEST:
-Are there any *fixed* characteristics of either that can be used to infer the other? Of any/all god(s) or satan?
-What must certainly distinguish good (ie. god) from evil (ie. satan)? What is the POI (point of insertion)?
-*What would so-called satan *require* would that *any* "BELIEVER" "BELIEVE" that evil is good (without the need to define them)?
(The answer is in the question!!)

Now INJECT "belief" into 8:
8=("BELIEF"/"?")

and CONSCIOUSLY INFER:
-what is the *reciprocal* of BELIEF?
-what belief is to satan, (?) is to god...?
-is there anything that negates belief?
-what would be needed/required to somehow KNOW how to tell any/all what *not* to BELIEVE in case of satan?
(The answer is in the question!!)

8=BELIEF/KNOWLEDGE

back to LORI:
What BELIEF is to SATAN (required to confuse so-called evil/good).
KNOWLEDGE is to GOD (required to reconcile so-called evil/good).

back to our universe:
(I?)(KNOWLEDGE/BELIEF)

back to LORI and applying these to (I?):
I KNOW...?
I BELIEVE...?
(two Edenic trees and/or halves of yang/yin)

and CONSCIOUSLY INFER:
-what is the relationship between KNOWLEDGE and BELIEF?
-would ALL-KNOWING necessarily indicate any/all *not* to "BELIEVE"?
-does ANY of this beg for inferring a *real* GOD and/or SATAN (nope), or just KNOWLEDGE and (of) BELIEF-BASED IGNORANCE? (yup)

LIFE
^
I KNOW
I BELIEVE...........vv
^^(*what not to*)<<< *
v
SUFFERING/DEATH

and the one that defeats any/all "BELIEF"-based theology:

If so-called satan *requires* BELIEF, who are they who are so willing to BELIEVE?
------------------------------

Argumentation to support:

**************************************************************************
FIRST FUNDAMENTAL DISTINCTION ARGUMENT:
**************************************************************************
*
P1. "BELIEF" (ie. state of) certainly exists.
P2. "KNOWLEDGE" as (it pertains) to: any/all who/what/where/why/when/how and/or if *not* to "BELIEVE" certainly exists by way of falsification (ie. trying).
C. "KNOWLEDGE" can certainly be distinct from (despite having been possibly attained by way of trying for their falsifiability) any/all "BELIEF(S)".
*
**************************************************************************

which challenges the (as I understand) currently-held philosophical position:

......"All knowing is belief, but not all belief is knowing."

as being ***ABSOLUTELY ABSURD***. The above thought experiment renders:

......"Any/all KNOWING is by way of indefinitely consciously trying BELIEF, but
......not any/all BELIEF is by way of indefinitely consciously trying to KNOW all.

And this defeats any/all "belief"-based theism which regards BELIEF>KNOWLEDGE (backwards).

**************************************************************************
PRIMORDIAL DICHOTOMOUS DIPOLE ARGUMENT:
**************************************************************************
*
P1. "BELIEF"-based ignorance(s) certainly exist would that any/all "BELIEVERS" "BELIEVE" (manifestly) what *is*, is not, and/or what *is not*, is (ie. CONFUSION).

P2. "KNOWLEDGE" as (it pertains) to: who/what/where/why/when/how and/or if *not* to "BELIEVE" certainly exists by way of falsification (ie. trying).

P3. "ALL-KNOWING" (ie. state of) must certainly be absent any/all "BELIEF"-based IGNORANCE(s) (ie. all-*not*-to-"BELIEVE"-in).

C. "BELIEF"(-based ignorance) and 'KNOWLEDGE' are certainly ANTITHETICALLY DICHOTOMOUS wherein:

the latter can be indefinitely pursued/acquired (ie. "AC"KNOWLEDGE"D") by (way of definitely trying) the former indefinitely until rendered obsolete and/or absolutely IMPOTENT.
*
**************************************************************************

CONSCIOUS KNOWLEDGE OF IGNORANCE ARGUMENT (CKOIA)

P1. Knowledge (ie. 'knowing') is certainly made attainable and/or practical by way of use of the (con)science(s).
P2. Knowing (how) to consciously falsify (ie. try/test) belief(s) for ignorance (ie. to consciously 'know' *if not* to believe) certainly exists and is definitely a (kind of) knowledge-in-and-of-itself.
P3. Any/all 'belief'-based ignorance(s) exist(s) in, as, of and/or by way of belief-in-and-of-itself.
C1. All-knowing is definitely approached by indefinitely trying to consciously falsify any/all "belief(s)" indefinitely (ad infinitum).

note:
BELIEF-in-and-of-itself would certainly be required
to CONFUSE the poles of any dichotomous dipole,
(including good/evil, should they exist).

and viz.:
If (there is a/any all-knowing) GOD(s) and/or deities, they would certainly KNOW of BELIEF-in-and-of-itself to be:
i. fundamentally required, would that UNKNOWING BELIEVERS BELIEVE 'BELIEF' is an immutable VIRTUE (ie. "good" if present/"evil" if absent in self ***AND/OR OTHERS***).
ii. fundamentally required, would that BELIEVERS BELIEVE EVIL is GOOD (equivalent: so-called satan is god).
iii. fundamentally NULLIFIED in/by any/all ALL-KNOWING 'state' by having falsified any/all "BELIEF(S)"

.**************************************************************************

So this can all be summarized in a single statement:

*************************************************************************************
"All-KNOWING is by way of (indefinitely) consciously TRYING BELIEF, but
not all BELIEF is by way of (indefinitely) TRYING to consciously KNOW all."
*************************************************************************************
This is the pragmatically practical (ie. non-belief-based) TRUTH/WAY/LIFE:

TRUTH: falsification/negation of any/all BELIEF-BASED IGNORANCE
WAY: trying consciously
LIFE: turning "belief"-based IGNORANCE into KNOWLEDGE (indefinitely)

which defeats the philosophical assertion:

"All knowing is belief, but not all belief is knowing."

And can be used either as a political framework/platform and/or establishes a workable global model (if adopted) definitely trending indefinitely towards PEACE rather than WAR.

I am A Gnostic Agnostic
What I know I know
What I do not know I do not know
I know to TRY, to TEST, to FALSIFY any/all BELIEF
I do not know how so many are so willing to BELIEVE.

(tree of living)
TRUTH/WAY/LIFE
^
I KNOW
I BELIEVE...........vv
^^(*what not to*)<<< *
v
SUFFERING/DEATH
(tree of good/evil)