The scientific need for god

62 posts / 0 new
Last post
MCDennis's picture
Nope. Science does not need
Teller's picture
Firstly I said as a result of
xenoview's picture
No we don't need a god(s) for
Teller's picture
Your subconscious brain makes
xenoview's picture
Even if are subconscious
Teller's picture
My friend god is dead. We
xenoview's picture
Your god died in 1882? Do you
Teller's picture
Your subconscious brain makes
MCDennis's picture
I don't think a lot about
Teller's picture
Firstly a all all-powerfull,
xenoview's picture
How do you know your god is
Teller's picture
My god is not all-powerful, I
xenoview's picture
So your god is the laws of
Nyarlathotep's picture
vfd - Now I'm saying that
Teller's picture
I understand your healthy
Nyarlathotep's picture
vfd - I wish you first
Teller's picture
Let us then agree to withhold
Nyarlathotep's picture
vfd - Although the notion
Teller's picture
Yes the second one is true,
Nyarlathotep's picture
vfd - (I shall answer in the
TokyoJones's picture
Interesting comment, vfd.
Teller's picture
The reason free will is a
CyberLN's picture
You rob me. You do not have
Teller's picture
What if two people robbed you
CyberLN's picture
Did ya see the "if found
TokyoJones's picture
I think you're confusing
Teller's picture
That last argument is
TokyoJones's picture
Thanks for the well
Truett's picture
Hey, TokyoJones. I really
TokyoJones's picture
Was it Stephen Weinberg who

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.