Study: Complex societies gave birth to big gods

15 posts / 0 new
Last post
Sapporo's picture
Study: Complex societies gave birth to big gods

"Complex societies gave birth to big gods, not the other way around":

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-03/cshv-csg032019.php

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

David Killens's picture
That is fascinating, it

That is fascinating, it reinforces my belief that man invented the god concept.

I wonder if those same researchers are studying apologetics, the Ark Encounter, and intelligent design, which are complex answers because the simplistic biblical tales have been shredded by critical thinking.

Sheldon's picture
"One prominent theory, the

"One prominent theory, the big or moralizing gods hypothesis, assumes that religious beliefs were key. According to this theory people are more likely to cooperate fairly if they believe in gods who will punish them if they don't. "To our surprise, our data strongly contradict this hypothesis," says lead author Harvey Whitehouse."

Well well, so much for the tedious line of apologetics that keeps claiming true morality is negated by secularism. Some atheists have maintained this was not true publicly for some time of course. Christopher Hitchens often pointed out that morality was not derived from religion, but preceded it.

Calilasseia's picture
I've managed to download the

I've managed to download the full paper from Nature. I suspect it will make even more interesting reading than the 2005 paper from the Pew Research Centre on societal health versus religiosity. That one blew supernaturalist pretensions out of the water with a nuclear depth charge.

Sheldon's picture
"That one blew

"That one blew supernaturalist pretensions out of the water with a nuclear depth charge."

Well evidence and facts are usually anathema to superstition with good reason. However if people can deny a scientific fact that underpins an entire scientific field, because it contradicts part of their superstitious beliefs, and with desperate rationalisation such as a supernatural demon called satan planting fossil evidence to mislead us.

Then it's clear they will never relinquish that belief no matter how much evidence stacks up against it.

At least we can link this thread everytime they breeze in here to lie about religion having moral ascendancy.

toto974's picture
For christians specifically,

For christians specifically, how do they explain that for almost two thousands years, christianity supported unequal, unegalitarian , authoritarian and bigoted societies?

Sheldon's picture
Good point. There was the

Good point. There was the crusades of course, the inquisition, the 30 year war that decimated much of Europe, enturies of European Christian antisemitism that ultimately ended in the Holocaust. All the main protagonists in WWI, and nearly all from WWII were Christian societies, and on and on it goes. Rwandan genocide involving the catholic clergy, the genocidal ethnic cleansing of muslims by Christian Serbia.

I don't think christianity is in any position to claim moral ascendancy over secularism. Yet we see theists breeze in here to make these risible claims all the time. Though they seldom stick around to hear the facts that contradict their arrogant grandiose claims.

toto974's picture
It is not like they can't

It is not like they can't read a fucking history book or have access to scientific knowledge, at least basic one.

David Killens's picture
Talyyn, we all know that when

Talyyn, we all know that when push comes to shove, they fall back on their holy book as the reference for history, everything else must bend to fit into that work of fantasy and fiction.

toto974's picture
David Killens, first, it is

David Killens, first, it is bad fantasy... Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings are clearly better... Second, the bible would not win any literary award today.

Maybe we should educate them, not about what is written in their holy book, but how it came to be, the history of their religions, these kind of things?

arakish's picture
Saporro quoted: "Complex

Saporro quoted: "Complex societies gave birth to big gods, not the other way around."

And this is a statement I have had many theists attempt to argue against. And miserably fail.

Sheldon: "Christopher Hitchens often pointed out that morality was not derived from religion, but preceded it."

Yep. As I have always said, morality actually began with the Australopithecines. There is evidence they gathered together realizing there is strength in numbers. And with gathering together for the "strength in numbers," morality was a given to occur.

Calilasseia: "blew supernaturalist pretensions out of the water with a nuclear depth charge."

As has been done for centuries for most pretensions, yet theists will still use those DEBUNKED pretensions and presuppostions. Does not speak so well for theist intelligence...

Sheldon: "At least we can link this thread everytime they breeze in here to lie about religion having moral ascendancy."

The only ascendency theists/religions have is immorality. In fact, that is all they have. "How to live the most immoral life yet appear to be moral."

Talyyn: "For christians specifically, how do they explain that for almost two thousands years, christianity supported unequal, unegalitarian, authoritarian, and bigoted societies?"

Yep. That is why my only bigotry is against those bigots.

David Killen: "We all know that when push comes to shove, they fall back on their holy book as the reference for history, everything else must bend to fit into that work of fantasy and fiction."

Yeah. It has amazed me how they can believe in something that has been proven to be completely wrong using evidence gathered from outside the source of those unholy plagiarized books of myths and legends. [[[[[[ ((((((Utter Bullocks)^∞)^∞)^∞)^∞)^…)] ^∞]^∞]^∞]^∞]^…] ^… … … .

rmfr

arakish's picture
And here is a copy paste

And here is a copy paste friendly version to do as Sheldon said, "At least we can link this thread everytime they breeze in here to lie about religion having moral ascendancy."

<a href="http://www.atheistrepublic.com/forums/debate-room/study-complex-societies-gave-birth-big-gods">Study: Complex societies gave birth to big gods</a>

rmfr

EDIT: Undid Nyar's editing

Randomhero1982's picture
I've always thought as such,

I've always thought as such, but furthermore, I also believe this is how morality evolved... through social structures.

arakish's picture
Exactly!

Exactly!

Glad to see you back Random.

rmfr

Calilasseia's picture
Much of the scientific

Much of the scientific literature on this subject is devoted to this very mechanism - namely, the evolution of ethical behaviour as a reinforcer of social cohesion.

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.