A fair just society in which we raise children to respect the rights of the individual and not to hold the pernicious belief that individuals should be judged on the basis of which "group" we perceive they belong to. Though to be fair a society where absolutely no one discriminated does sound a little bit like some sort of dystopian totalitarianism that crushes all dissent. I always think education is the answer here, but of course even the word education can become sinister if it's used to brainwash or indoctrinate people.

Bottom line I think is that the best societies have universal rights, and protect the individual and educate it's citizens about the pointless and pernicious nature of discrimination, It;s an ideal of course, something you constantly work toward rather than an end goal you achieve.

Why can't we unite as a race and deal with problems at hand?

Biology, mis-education, indoctrination, low intelligence, confirmation bias, 'self' defence, stupidity, fear, in-group parochialism, out-group misanthropy, pain, hunger, hopelessness, plenty more I suppose, just give it some thought.

People who are wise, comfortable, secure, (in themselves), thoughtful, educated, etc., may concur with your hopes of a fair and non-discriminatory society. But you cannot FORCE other people to agree or co-operate. So for the time being we're stuck. The better question, perhaps, is what can we do about the problems which lead to a failure to achieve the utopia ? You'll never stop people from being people.

You know, it sucks, but to be fair minded, and unbiased, and non-discriminatory, one has to put up with the opposite from those who do NOT subscribe.

Maybe it's a bit off-topic, but when I drive on the road, I do my utmost to abide by the rules. But I see many people who do not. There is a tendency to feel like: "If other people do the wrong thing, why shouldn't I also disobey the rules?" But to do so is only to contribute and to maintain the problem.

Worse, I hear our politicians say that we shouldn't take the necessary 'painful' steps to combat global warming, because if we do that, other countries around the world will just keep on polluting, and warming etc., so why should our country put up with the 'pain' of making changes? My view is that we ought to lead by example, (of doing what's needed), even in the face of the failure of others to do the necessary. Otherwise we'd just maintain the problem EVEN MORE, if we don't act with wisdom.

Again, it sucks, but to work on solutions, one has to put up with the opposite from those who do NOT want to, or care to subscribe.

Discrimination is unjust by definition, and therefore pernicious. To me this infers it is also immoral, as my moral worldview necessarily is tied to the idea of promoting human well being and minimising suffering.