Zeitgeist(created by Peter Joseph) is simply put, wrong in ALMOST every claim it makes, but like any good conspiracy theory "(It) combines a few facts, focus on correlations and builds an intriguing story that seems to fit the pieces together nicely - provided you don't actually dig below the surface to find out where they might have gone wrong"- Matt Dillahunty. .
The popularity of this documentary can be attributed to two factors, conformation bias and uncritical acceptance To avoid a perception that this is all a product of my own opinion I will bring in external sources, while I prefer to construct my own arguments I feel this is necessary.
The Greatest Story Ever Garbled
by Tim Callahan Religious Editor at Skeptic Magazine -http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-02-25/
The unofficial Atheist Experience response to Zeitgeist- http://atheistexperience.blogspot.com/2008/12/unofficial-atheist-experie...
Dr. Chris Forbes Senior Lecturer in Ancient History, and Deputy Chairman of the Society for the Study of Early Christianity.
Refutation of Zeitgeist- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-2HBSfPZpU
Zeitgeist Companion Guide- http://skepticproject.com/articles/zeitgeist/companion-guide/
What Skepticism Reveals about Science (Scientific American)
by Michal Shermer -https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-skepticism-reveals/
Refuting Zeitgeist the Movie - Mark Foreman, PhD Professor of Philosophy & Religion at Liberty University,-
Web Skeptic Zeitgeist - Part 1: The Greatest Story ever told -http://webskeptic.wikidot.com/zeitgeist-story-of-jesus
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
Yeah, it is totally ridiculously. I've seen them. A bunch of crazy shit about
Well at least the last one is half right; it was ruled unconstitutional in 1895, that is why they passed a constitutional amendment (the 16th to make it constitutional). They always seem to leave that part out; I guess because it isn't as sensational if you include that.
Indeed, I avoided going beyond the religious aspect of the documentary because everything else has conspiracy written all over it and I doubt anyone here actually accepts them as true. But I have noticed (without mentioning any names) individuals on here who do propagate the idea that Jesus is either a rehash of egyptian mythology or a rehash of a sun God narrative. I almost included the Christ myth theory but decided that was off topic so I left it out. It's a tricky subject for me because my opinion is that he is a myth but the majority of scholarly opinion is that he most likely existed. So It's an area where I have trouble squaring the circle of my opinion, of which I posses no credibility in this field, vs those who DO in fact have credibility and their opinions.