Back to Basics... A Question for Theists

155 posts / 0 new
Last post
Lee Wallace's picture
Nope - we can detect many
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Right, I agree we can detect
Lee Wallace's picture
Thus why in science
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Testing things indirectly isn
Lee Wallace's picture
Nope - we can detect many
rtmcdge's picture
If Islam had continued doing
MCDennis's picture
You're wrong!!! Of course we
chimp3's picture
LIGO has detected the gravity
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Hmm.

Attachments

Attach Image/Video?: 

Yes
chimp3's picture
Not LIGO.
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Not for you lol.
MCDennis's picture
Let's assume you are correct.
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
You're asking for the wrong
MCDennis's picture
No sir. The story you
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Captain Obvious hasn't
MCDennis's picture
John, since you are unwilling
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Funny, I concluded the same
MCDennis's picture
idiot
chimp3's picture
The observation by LIGO was
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Of course! So long as you
chimp3's picture
I was not referencing any god
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Ironically I never made a
chimp3's picture
So.. We come down to
Amber Horner's picture
@john,
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
For what? Last I heard that
Nyarlathotep's picture
John 6IX Breezy - There's no
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
With my eyes, duh. So if you
Nyarlathotep's picture
John 6IX Breezy - With my
LogicFTW's picture
Hah! was reading through this
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
You clearly didn't understand

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.