The Case for Macroevolution

295 posts / 0 new
Last post
Dave Matson's picture
John 61X Breezy,
arakish's picture
And always remember what
Sheldon's picture
Yet despite your attempts to
Dave Matson's picture
John 61X Breezy,
Sushisnake's picture
@Greensnake
David Killens's picture
Breezy's strategy is simple.
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
1. If I'm being challenged,

1. If I'm being challenged, or am being asked to debate a point (which I rarely like to do), then 100% I'm going to locate weaknesses in the opponents arguments and attack those.

2. Seeing weaknesses in their argument makes people frustrated, so what do they do? They double-down; and if they double-down why shouldn't I double-down? Give them a pass on their weaknesses, and they won't do the same for me.

3. I don't derail conversations; conversations naturally branch out as new people join the conversation, and comment on different things. Sushisnake wanted to discuss phylogenetic trees and bird-dinosaur evolution. Cyber wanted to complain about evolutionary biologists again. Nyar wanted to argue what hypotheses are. You guys derail the conversation, and simply go down whichever tracks are more interesting.

I can't both become entrenched in a position and derail the conversation simultaneously silly lol.

CyberLN's picture
John, you wrote, “Cyber
Sheldon's picture
"100% I'm going to locate
Dave Matson's picture
Sheldon,
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
The comparison between me and
Sheldon's picture
"The comparison between me
Armando Perez's picture
Breezy,
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
I'll take it, since once
Sheldon's picture
"I'll take it, since once
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
"Publication of [Copernicus']
Sheldon's picture
Straw man red herring, you'll

Straw man red herring, you'll never change. The point, since you have ignored it, is that your claims are denying properly validated scientific fact. Whilst championing a superstitious creation myth for which you can demonstrate no objective evidence. Whilst falsely pretending your claims have scientific validity. Meanwhile you're trashing aspects of the scientific method that you find inconvenient like the world wide scientific consensus on species evolution that has lasted almost 160 years of proper scrutiny with a risible conspiracy theory.

What's with lol after every post, are you 13?

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
While I've constantly

While I've constantly mentioned that my view on evolution would not change if I was atheist, I have heard that Copernicus' ideas may have been influenced by some form of sun worship ideology (see Farris, 2003).

Reference: Farris, T. (2003). Coming of age in the Milky Way. New York: Harper-Collinsh

Sheldon's picture
"While I've constantly
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
"...this doesn't make his
Sheldon's picture
No it isn't "questionable"
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
"just flip on any news
Sheldon's picture
And there's the evasion again
ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
These aren't even ad hominems
Sheldon's picture
Nothing in that post
Armando Perez's picture
Breezy,
Sheldon's picture
Your assessment is accurate,
Sheldon's picture
"I can't both become
Dave Matson's picture
John 61X Breezy,
Dave Matson's picture
David Killens,

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.