Impossible
Donating = Loving
Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.
Log in or create an account to join the discussions on the Atheist Republic forums.
LOL LIke Sheldon, My infinite amount of patients has reached a finite limit. Ok,,,, I admit it, I never really had an infinite amour of patients. On the other hand I do know enough not to pick on the mentally handicapped. So when someone does it on purpose it just irks me.
"LOL LIke Sheldon, My infinite amount of patients has reached a finite limit."
Infinite patients...that'll fuck health care up every time, boom boom tsch.
I know what you mean though, my patience threshold is a fucking blur in the rear view mirror.
God...the great improbability.
I think it's impossible for some simple religious folk to not fail at reason.
Question:
What if oranges were yellow and lemons were orange? Would we still call lemons "lemons", but call oranges "yellows"? Or would we call lemons "oranges" and call oranges "lemons"?
Lemons come in many shapes and sizes. I once bought a lemon but had to return it to the dealership.
Orange you glad I didn't say banana?...lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evIHP6Ob7Es
Question:
If quizzes are quizzical, what are tests?
Testicles?
rmfr
Ha ha
Question:
I was bitten by a floridian jellyfish when I was young, should I still drink decaffeinated tea?
doG "Question:
I was bitten by a floridian jellyfish when I was young, should I still drink decaffeinated tea?"
Oh hell no, only half double decaffeinated half-caf, with a twist of lemon.
...and no fucking sugar, you heathens.
Word salad
What objective evidence can you demonstrate for any deity?
This is the only thing that matters ultimately, and it's not going away no matter how much vapid appeal to ignorance fallacies you make.
Do you believe bread wafers and wine can be transformed into blood and flesh by the Eucharist?
I once turned wine and pizza into a mess the cab driver did not like.
Taxi drivers can be very fickle that way.
@Sheldon
"Do you believe bread wafers and wine can be transformed into blood and flesh by the Eucharist?"
Yes
@ catholicray
Ever thought of seeking psychiatric help? Anyone who believes that bullshit is definitely suffering schizophrenic delusion disorder.
rmfr
I have to respect your commitment and honesty.
I also admit to respecting his right to have that commitment and honesty. But I ain't got to respect the beliefs themselves.
I still stand by my assessment that anyone who believes koolaid and a cracker can become the blood and flesh of a make-believe character is suffering from schizophrenic delusion disorder.
rmfr
lol I did not want to pollute a positive comment by going any further. Unlike many theists in here, it is actually refreshing to see catholicray respond so honestly and promptly. Most in here know that many theists hem and haw for a long time, and even when you put their feet to the fire, they veer off in some evasion tactic.
So he does deserve a pat on the back for his honesty, even though my opinion is at odds with his.
Turn wine into blood? Do you know how many lives can be saved if this was true? Why has the Red Cross not been informed so they can switch from asking for blood donations to growing grapes? Why has the Catholic Church not done something about this, because the amount of suffering that could be eliminated is massive on a global scale?
Or at least, have priests wander the halls of hospitals handing out wafers like mints? Of course they would have to be supervised, no one wants a priest alone in a room with an unconscious child. That is a pedophile's wet dream.
Sheldon "Do you believe bread wafers and wine can be transformed into blood and flesh by the Eucharist?"
catholicray "Yes"
How does that happen exactly, and what objective evidence can you demonstrate to support this claim?
NB I would appreciate it if we could skip the dishonest semantics this time around, about believing something not being an affirmation of the claim.
@ray
So your into cannabillism?
Never ceases to amaze me how believers read a few bronze/ iron age texts and they feel qualified as amateur phycisists and biologists.
"Never ceases to amaze me how believers read a few bronze/ iron age texts and they feel qualified as amateur phycisists and biologists."
Amateur? Breezy thinks he's falsified every biologist on the planet's position for the last 160 years, including Darwin.
Which reminds me, why am I not reading news headlines about his paper falsifying evolution? What the fuck is the hold up, he was gracious enough to share his sagacity with us months ago?
There was once a character who said that if you wanted eternal life you had to eat his flesh and drink his blood. So they grabbed him and beat him up and nailed him to a cross. The crowd then swarmed him and ate him up like they were a pack of raveneous zombies. They all got diarrhea and died. Imagine being the guy who ate the asshole.
LOL.
But you said they ALL ate the asshole...
"The crowd then swarmed him and ate him up like they were a pack of raveneous zombies."
See?
Terraphon,
When zombies eat a person the person could have been an "asshole" but one of the zombies will alway end up eating the actual asshole. It is a zombie movie trope.
@ catholicray
In all honesty, as most scientists I am familiar with, there is no such thing as "impossible." Just that something is so improbable, it is "practically" impossible.
Now to read the other replies.
rmfr
No concise accurate definition of any deity, and not a shred of objective evidence, or even a single cogent let alone rational argument for any deity.
Same old story, bandwidth gets a pasting but absolutely nothing worthwhile is offered in support of religious belief.
We will of course shortly be admonished for ignoring the "evidence" that catholicray has presented.
If a deity existed its absurd to imagine its frustration at the ineptitude of the apologetic wouldn't have force it to intervene by now.
Pages