@Flatland: You shared your cookie with them?

No. I paid them 7 euro to look at some of the enormous wealth they've extorted over the past two millennia.

@Flatland

Still leaving us guess who you are responding to I see. And no it doesn't really matter at all, as you're simply trotting out bizarre unevidenced superstitious fantasies again, unworthy of any serious or substantive response.

I ask again as I did at the start, what objective evidence can you demonstrate for many supernatural demons or spirits? Or any deity, or anything beyond the natural physical world and universe.

Though by now I think the question is redundant, as the answer can be clearly inferred from you ignoring the question.

@Flatland

Are you the only one who doesn't have to demonstrate any evidence for your claims then? Typical theistic hypocrisy.

@Flatland:

If you consider the Bible evidence, then yes. What do you think would be the aggregate death toll for Noah's flood, the nuking of Sodom & Gomorrah, and the plagues of Egypt? Add to those all the people murdered for masturbating, touching the Ark of the Covenant, worshiping a golden calf, and mocking a bald guy. Then there was the Egyptian army drowned in the Red Sea (most of whom were just following orders) , and all the victims of Samson the Serial Killer.

The Old Testament god was a vicious warlord. And then in the New Testament he gets really nasty.

@ Flatland

"Do you have demonstrable evidence of that?"

It is all right there, in the bible.

Additionally, based on the same bible, god is a lair while the devil is honest.

@Flatkand

"Is that why you hate God so much? Because he killed more than Satan?"

Yes, you certainly do seem confused.

How can I hate a being in whom I do not believe?

Perhaps part of your confusion is due to a common assumption made by Christians on this forum. That use of the word 'god' refers to
the Abrahamic god, YHWH. There are some 30,000 religions world wide, with the Hindus alone having 15 MILLION gods. I find the gods of other faiths and their world views no more absurd than the claims of any of the Abrahamic faiths,

IF I go by the Torah , YHWH is certainly worthy of hatred and fear.IE he is petulant, unforgiving, vindictive, cruel, sadistic and genocidal . This is the Jewish god.

Although Christians allegedly worship the same god, it is clear that they do not. (well, apart from the simple minded literalist evangelical beliefs)

My Catholic eduction concentrated on the compassionate , loving Jesus. Very little time l was spent on God The Father . How could I hate Jesus? ---if I believed in the certainty of his historical existence and that he was/ is god? I am agnostic about the historicity of Jesus, and think his historicity is is irrelevant to Christianity. That has nothing to do with my atheism.

For our new little friend/ irritant/ chew toy/troll/whatever:

The word term 'atheist' comes from the Greek: a=without/not and theos=god .

When applied to a person, it means that person does not believe in god(s), NOTHING ELSE IS INFERRED.

In the tedious way of most apologist we get here, this one makes the most common, and egregious mistakes. Although clearly knowing nothing about the topic, he (?) has the hubris to presume to tell atheist what they believe and do not believe.

As with dozens before him , our new little friend skates off into physics, astro physics and cosmology, just for a start. None of these things have anything to with my atheism. I'm not a scientist and don't understand most of it any more than our little friend with his howlers*** of claims .

I used the term 'egregious mistakes" . This because as far as I can see, the mistakes have arisen form a stunning depth of wilful ignorance . Simple lack of intelligence is simply a fact. That he found his way here and has managed to post suggests a basic level of intelligence. Purblind ignorance is not a crime. However, with the ease of gaining information today through IT, perhaps it should be.

I have no patience with the same silly irrelevant claims made by a continuum of arrogant and patronising ignoramuses.

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((9))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

*** . "A howler is a glaring blunder, clumsy mistake or embarrassing misjudgment, typically one which evokes laughter.[1][2]

The Oxford English Dictionary defines howler, "3.3 slang. Something 'crying', 'clamant', or excessive; spec. a glaring blunder, esp. in an examination, etc.", and gives the earliest usage example in 1872.[3] Eric Partridge's Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English says; the 1951 edition of Partridge defined it in part as: "... A glaring (and amusing) blunder: from before 1890; ... also, a tremendous lie ... Literally something that howls or cries for notice, or perhaps ... by way of contracting howling blunder."[4]

Another common interpretation of this usage is that a howler is a mistake fit to make one howl with laughter. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howler_(error)