The Kalam Cosmological Argument

104 posts / 0 new
Last post
SammyShazaam's picture
I think there could very well
PsychoSarah's picture
You have one article that
SammyShazaam's picture
In science, there is a common
Shock of God's picture
This argument does not assume
Zaphod's picture
I like to believe most things
brajendraprasad's picture
Agreeeee!!!!
CyberLN's picture
SoG, am curious, where did
Shock of God's picture
I am a senior in high school.
Zaphod's picture
Where are you going to
Shock of God's picture
Iowa State University
brajendraprasad's picture
Please talk about scientific
Uzzman's picture
Well, I heard that Kalam
Sancho Panza's picture
Easy to refute. Instead of
Shock of God's picture
God did not *begin* to exist,
SammyShazaam's picture
Who says that energy did not
Shock of God's picture
God did not *begin* to exist,
SammyShazaam's picture
Of course energy existed
brajendraprasad's picture
The kid's a school senior who
Shock of God's picture
An argumentum ad hominem does
Sancho Panza's picture
1. "God did not *begin* to
Shock of God's picture
You state that we must accept
CyberLN's picture
Re-read your second paragraph
brajendraprasad's picture
Now this kid is talking
thereisnogod's picture
So who do YOU think this
brajendraprasad's picture
Your argument is an exercise
Shock of God's picture
"1. "Everything begins with
Nyarlathotep's picture
as usual appealing to the
Shock of God's picture
"All the evidence we have
Nyarlathotep's picture
"The Big Bang theory tells us
Shock of God's picture
"The initial singularity was

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.