QUESTIONS AJ777 refuses to answer.
Donating = Loving
Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.
Log in or create an account to join the discussions on the Atheist Republic forums.
@ Empedocles
Nyarlathotep, can we also get a set of Disagree buttons in the 100, 1k, 10k ranges? ;-P
Oh how wrong you are.
There is only ONE thing that is common amongst all atheists: "Lack of belief in any gods." There is nothing else in common with atheists. I know atheists who also do not believe the Earth is a spheroid.
Kind sir, please do some actual critical thinking, logical and deductive reasoning, and rational and analytical thought, before you start flinging baseless and fallacious and inane and asinine assertions.
rmfr
@arakish
Only one, huh? That is funny because you say critical thinking, logical and deductive reasoning and blah, blah, blah. Only one thing. What about you were born on Earth? You have blood flowing through your veins? You breath?
Empedocles, yes, a non-thinking non-reasoning illogical person who was born on Mars and somehow has no blood flow would be an atheist, as long as he/she does not believe in god(s).
@CHK-C
Yes, but you wouldn't have the two additional things I mentioned in common.
Empedocles: "What about you were born on Earth? You have blood flowing through your veins? You breath?"
Unfortunately, these are facts I am forced to share with Religious Absolutists.
There may be more than ONE thing common amongst atheists, but the the only true commonality amongst atheist is “a lack of belief in any deities.” Furthermore, that definition could be refined to “a lack of belief in claims any deities exist.”
One good example of another "belief" (lack of better word) amongst a large number of atheist is the belief that the Theory of Evolution is FACTS (Formulated Accurately Codified Truth in Science).
Reiteration: There is only one true commonality amongst atheists. “A lack of belief in claims any deities exist.”
And until you Religious Absolutists can provide irrefutable OBJECTIVE HARD EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE that any deity exists, your preposterous claims shall be summarily dismissed.
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit non ei qui negat.
rmfr
@arakish
You think it's my responsibility to do that? No wonder you have no idea of what you criticize, you wait around for someone else to bear the burden and then have no choice but to dismiss it out of complete ignorance.
Doesn't sound very scientific to me and it sure as hell don't make for much of a debate.
I bet you're an independent thinker, aren't you? Independent of thought.
@ Empedocles
I'll keep this short since I have written books about this.
Yes it is your responsibility. Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit non ei qui negat. Latin for "He who says he does not have the burden of proof lies."
You are the one asserting preposterous claims of a deity without any proof (OBJECTIVE HARD EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE). The burden is on you to back up your claims, or admit you cannot and are wrong.
Oh, I know what I criticize. I have studied religion, many different religions, for over 50 years. Probably longer than you have been alive. However, my particular expertise is the Noahacian Flood Myth and The Exodus That Went Nowhere. Perhaps the two greatest lynchpins in the Judeo-Christian beliefs systems. Discovering through the decades of research I have done, and actually traveling all around the region of the Levant and Mediterranean in the attempt to prove these two stories correct, I only discovered they are stories plagiarized and re-written from sources FAR! older than the Bible. Many of those sources/stories are thousands of years older than the Bible and the Hebrew people themselves.
Did you know that the Hebrews did not come into existence until around 900 BCE? Five hundred years after the events that supposedly occurred in the book of Exodus (circa 1450 BCE)? Please explain how the Hebrews (later Jews) could have been enslaved in Egypt from circa 1880 BCE to 1450 BCE when the Hebrew people did not exit until around 900 BCE? The dates were derived from many hundreds of biblical scholars agreeing that the Exodus began in 1450 BCE. The beginning date is simply adding the 430 years from Exodus 12:40 "Now the time that the children of Israel lived in Egypt was four hundred thirty years."
Only because you are not a scientist. I am a volcanologist working at the world's largest land-based caldera.
Not independent thinker. Free and Rational Thinker (a FaRT). ;-P
Speaking of “independent of thought,” you seem to be the epitome of such since you fail to do any research into the presupposed assumptive assertions you are making without any evidence.
rmfr
"Only one thing. What about you were born on Earth? You have blood flowing through your veins? You breath?"
He said common among atheists, now ask yourself are those characteristics limited to atheists? Dear oh dear but you really are dumb, and there are three fucking things there genius, good grief.
@Sheldon
Are you denying the commonality of the two examples I provided upon request, you vacuous little fuck or did you somehow read exclusive in the response.
@ Sheldon, @Empedocles,
Can we remain civil and not resort to insults?
@Talyyn
Yes, of course. My apologies to Sheldon and the forum.
Sorry but I can't dumb that down anymore for you.
You're the one who believes in myths and superstitious magic, that you can't demonstrate a shred of objective evidence for, so you calling anyone vacuous is pretty ironic. Maybe you would benefit from anger management therapy, you seem pretty tightly wound.
Empedocles,
The 257th Set of Theist Beliefs
1. There are thousands of Gods and billions of demons.
2. Magic and witchcraft are the best answers to mankind's problems.
3. All life came from golems and ribs.
4. The Earth is a solid equilateral square triangle resting on a turtle.
5. The Bible, Koran, and the Book of Mormon came directly from space aliens.
@ AJ777
======================================================================
And do not forgot to address the questions directly posed and implied in this short essay...
There is no philosophical ideology more divisive than religion. Religion does nothing but pervert, demoralize, subvert, and bribe all persons with the belief that it alone possesses the one and only truth. And, the worst part of ANY religion is that it is an ideology that is implicitly and explicitly protected from any and all criticism from both within and without. Why should any ideology, especially religion, be so privileged? Can you not see how disastrous this way of thinking can be, and is?
I know religion is, and has always been, tremendously harmful to Humanity. I know that religions, and their way of thinking, and their theological disagreements, have created the greatest violence, destruction, injury, death, bigotry, harm, immorality, intolerance, wickedness, and abuse to the human species than any other cause. The main problem is not religious fundamentalism, but the fundamentals of religion. Religion’s loose version of “morality,” has NO place in a civilized society.
Sure. You can argue that it is the extremists, not the doctrine. All this says to me is that you have never truly read the various doctrines. It is both. Extremists might be using it as an excuse, but it is an excuse that the religious texts readily provide. I firmly believe, and shall take this belief to my grave, that the human species would have been much better off had there NEVER been ANY form of religion. EVER!
I see NO evidence of ANY gods, but plenty of evidence of religion’s harm.
And I am a lot more concerned with the welfare of my fellow human beings than I am about “offending” or “hurting the feelings” of a bunch of barbarians who choose to believe in the faerie tales of an obsolete, irrelevant, savage, offensive, and unsubstantiated, immoral Bronze and Iron Age religious text about a make-believe imaginative Sky Faerie and Magic Lich Virgin.
Offended? So the fuck what!
Ultimately, it is Religion that is Humankind’s worst enemy.
rmfr
@ Everyone
Here is a project I finally partially finished. Partially, because I may not have caught all the questions. This is a list of all the questions where AJ777 did a Breezy, constantly refusing to answer. Quite impressive.
This is a list of ALL the Questions, Inquiries, and Requests AJ777 is too afraid to answer because
All of these questions come from ONLY the thread How can religion be evil? Also, please realize this list is NOT completely exhaustive.
I wonder if this is a new record for these forum boards?
rmfr
I love the point 49.
This is too good for me to pass up. I'm going to take 20 at a time until I get bored or distracted by another thread.
How to think is important, that's education. What to think is propaganda. All art, however, is propaganda. When we state opinions, criticisms or debate ancient texts is that propaganda? Sometimes.
Morality is subjective. Objective morality seems like a contradiction in terms. Hell isn't a Bible teaching. The other accusations would have to be debated one at a time.
I suppose it is conceivable, but more likely that the children and grandchildren would suffer the consequences of the imprisonment, though not actually being punished for the crime.
I loath organized religion primarily because mass appeal and the corruption of power tends to corrupt and transmogrify the original teachings. Taoism and Christianity are stunning examples of this, but they all do it, except possibly for Shintoism because of it's original syncretistic nature.
That's pretty rough. I've discovered that atheists tend to boast of these wonderful abilities while often just shooting off their fucking mouths with uninformed opinions, but let's just let that play out and we'll see who can put back it up.
Again, it's a contradiction in terms. Morality was prescribed differently by Jehovah over periods of time. What was moral for Adam wasn't necessarily moral for Moses, or Jesus, or Paul. My Bible beliefs indicate to me that morality in a basic sense is instilled in all of us. We seem "wired" to know what is right and wrong in this sense.
Do you make such frequent use of the double negative intentionally? I loath organized religion and philosophy so I guess I'll have to leave this one to AJ777. I will say anything can be as or more divisive than religion. Politics, fashion, sports, love, music, art, class, etc.
Does not do nothing but . . . well, higher education, colleges were basically founded by the Catholic Church, and it could be said that that's where science was born. Islam pretty much preserved classical learning and the philosophical insight of antiquity through the dark ages. Many religions, as loathsome as they are, are far more charitable than any atheistic entity that I've ever heard of.
Yeah, I saw it when I made my first post here.
No more or less evil than any other endeavor of mankind.
Can you demonstrate objective evidence what you had for lunch last Tuesday? Terms like evidence and proof are abused by uninformed atheists.
Well, I'm gay, though I don't think I was born that way. That's debatable, though. God doesn't insist everyone worship him, committed genocide? That seems highly unlikely since he created two people who propagated all people and we're still here. But if he had committed genocide I suppose, as creator, he would have the authority to do that with good reason. The infant you speak of has the hope of resurrection and, again, God had good reason to do that.
Does it really, now? No it doesn't, but again the point is moot because morality is subjective.
That's a new one on me. Read dictionaries? One doesn't read dictionaries like a book, they reference it.
It is subjective.
They can be.
It looks to me like he his cup runneth over.
No more or less than you I would imagine.
No.
What is the obsession with morality? Murder is often thought to be immoral.
Empedocles "Hell isn't a Bible teaching."
Revelation 21:8
8 But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulphur. This is the second death.”
https://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/hell-bible-verses/
Have you even read the bible?
Part 2
What is the difference? Morality is often presented in the guise of cowardice. Am I not going to hurt you because I'm moral or because I know that to do so would hurt me? Morality is subjective. We've been through this several times.
[sigh] I can see where AJ777 would get frustrated at these questions.
In a sense, yes.
Sure.
Obviously. Where and when has there not been slavery? Someone must have morally justified it. You keep bringing up morals and then criticize other cultures from other times for their morality. You are a slave. A slave to debt in a debt based economy. A slave to fractional reserve bankers.
Hmmm . . . I have to think about that . . . . I would have to say possibly. There are some factors there to consider, some of them having to do with the way in which you formulated the question. 1. The Bible doesn't teach a literal torment for any reason. 2. Morality is subjective. 3. The person's choice. It's his / her responsibility no matter what the evidence and 4. Evidence is also subjective.
No.
The later. At Matthew 13:34-35 Jesus quotes Psalm 78:2 which clearly indicates intent. So editing and mistranslation or whatever wasn't the reason for it. Metaphors, parables, illustrations etc. are effective for 5 reasons. 1. They get your attention 2. They provoke thught. 3. They apply to the emotion, which is more in line with how people think. Emotionally rather than logically. 4. They aid memory. and 5. They preserve truth, transcending time and place.
When the Bible was written, in 3 different languages, the people in the area where it was written spoke many more languages than that. Nevertheless, you're going to criticize the creator of the universe and everything in it or primitive desert dwelling goat herders for incompetence when the Bible is translated in just about every language known to man, available throughout the world thousands of years later?
I see good and evil as subjective terms. Your idea of good and evil comes from somewhere and where do you think that is? It depends upon where you were born and lived, at least to a certain extent. So let's say you reject the morality of the Bible because of something like slavery. Was there slavery in your past, your ancestors and your culture? Now do you reject those morals or do you unwittingly adhere to them.
Is it? Perhaps this is a question for AJ777 specifically.
Yes. If it existed, which it doesn't.
Deuteronomy 21:21. How old do you think the child this applies to would have been? An adult child.
No.
It's an incorrect view of scripture. And even if it wasn't it would no longer apply. It only applied to the ancient Israelite until the covenant was broken and remade through Christ. It wouldn't apply to Christians because it would be against the law of most countries, and wasn't applicable to Christians anyway.
Nothing.
Well, specifically none, but coveting, loving your neighbor and God would forbid torture. Rape was a crime against the Law of Moses. There are more than 10 commandments, you know.
Deuteronomy 4:9
No.
Evil is subjective.
It certainly could be. I think it is.
arakish,
"I wonder if this is a new record for these forum boards?"
Your new nickname is "Perry Mason".
LMAOWF
rmfr
Why four? Isn't the one enough?
@ Empedocles
But is not four better than one?
rmfr
Arakish, funny! Here’s another. Didn’t a moderator on this forum reprimand you and advise that no one is required to answer any and every question posed?
Is it immoral to torture children? If so, why do you think it is?
Are you ever going to stop trolling by the way, I don't really care, but it says a great deal about how closed minded your beliefs are that you behave like this when people offer cogent objections you cannot answer.
⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ and what he said ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑
rmfr
@ AJ777
No. The Mod informed YOU that you do not have to answer every question. My point is that you have not answered even one question that was posed at you.
And I also have the right to show the proof of how great of an evasive deceiver you are. Just like ALL Religious Absolutists.
And as in your avatar, why is not your deity helping you since you seem unable to help yourself? (Question 168 you will never answer…)
rmfr
The moderator told him, he couldn't tell people to leave AR.
⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ and that also ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑ ⇑
rmfr
I sure wish folks (both ‘sides’) would actually debate in this debate forum.
Pages