Exactly, it's an arguement based on a fantasy and anyone can play that kind of intellectually dishonest pseudoscience bollocks.

It relies on a premise that has not and likely would not ever happen? What are the mechanics to make a star dim and illuminate like a signal lamp?

Seriously, that is no different to me saying...

If a satellite saw a strange shadow on our sun and it was Tin Man surfing on an anti gravity board into the sun and out of the opposite side,
That would be just cause yo believe that Tin Man had miraculous powers and was not subject to the laws of nature and physics.

Therefore, tin man is God.

Utter, utter, utter bollocks!

@ source code that does not work

“If SETI found a signal like the one I described.”

You already said that SETI has found such a signal. Please provide us with the OBJECTIVE HARD EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE of this MPG file you keep mentioning.

Until you do provide that OBJECTIVE HARD EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE, then apply...

The Eleven Razors:

1. Sagan's Razor: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
2. Hitchens's Razor: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
3. Arakish's Razor: NO EVIDENCE = NO EXISTENCE. Or, if there is no evidence for "it," then "it" does not exist.
4. Xenoview's Razor: Objective claims requires objective evidence.
5. Randomhero1982's Razor: If it's not evidenced, it's bollocks.
6. Cognostic's Razor: Any dweeb can make an assertion.
7. LogicFTW's Razor: You MUST first prove your religion/claim is not a con.
8. CyberLN's Razor: A nice vinaigrette dressing must be served with any word salad.
9. Nyarlathotep's Razor: Homines quod muta (People is dumb).
10. Philip K. Dick's Razor: Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
11. Tin-Man's Butter Knife: Any ridiculous nonsense presented will be countered with opposing ridiculous nonsense of an equal or greater amount.

• Cognostic's Shovel: When someone starts slinging bullshit at you, get a shovel and sling it back.

Additionally, you have done nothing more than prove these...

The List to Determine and Spot a Religious Absolutist and they only need match just ONE:

1. They LIE without ever thinking about the veracity of their statement.
2. They LIE without ever providing any evidence of their statement.
3. They LIE by believing inexorably everything they state, regardless of how inaccurate.
4. They LIE by being absolute in their statements (either I believe you or I am worthless scum).
5. They LIE by using beguiling dialectical semantics.
6. They LIE by using distorted and perverted data.
7. They LIE by creating irrational excuses.
8. They LIE by utilizing whiney-ass pleas.
9. They LIE by not realizing why they need to defend their beliefs.
10. They LIE by utilizing presupposed conclusions with no evidence.
11. They LIE by making accusations they never apologize for even when they are proven wrong.
12. They LIE by changing the subject.
13. They LIE by taking text out of context and twisting and perverting said text to fit their presupposed confirmation bias.
14. They LIE by shifting the burden of proof.

And since you seem to confuse these...

Simpler definitions

• Agnostic – This means nothing more than "without knowledge." I am agnostic in there are many things I do not know. Thus, I am without that knowledge, thus agnostic. Everyone is agnostic to a certain point. I cannot put this any simpler.
• Atheist – If translated literally, this means "without god." However, in today's terminology, atheism actually means "a lack of or disbelief in any claims for the existence of any deity."
• Anti-theist – This one, in my definition, means exactly as it says; anti- = "against," theist = "belief in one god." Or better, "against belief in any deity."
• Anti-religionist – This one is exactly as it says: "against religion."
• Apistevist – lack of blind faith; one who does not rely on religious blind faith in order to discern true facts.

So far, all you have done is provide preposterous, incredulous, ridiculous, bizarre, absurd, fantastic, crazy, foolish, impossible, laughable, irrational, nonsensical, outrageous, senseless, ludicrous, stupid, unbelievable, unreasonable, unthinkable, shocking, insane, asinine, exorbitant, silly, far-out, harebrained, wacky, and completely unsubstantiated assertions, claims, and assumptions.

“Wish in one hand and do something with the other. Squeeze both hands real hard and see which one comes true.” — Prince Corwin, Chronicles of Amber

rmfr

I'm going to go ahead and apologize for the atheists that have shown that they are unable to understand the wisdom of the brilliant sourcecodewizard.

I wasn't sure, so I went right to the source and found this, which absolutely PROVES what he has been saying. Get ready for it......

"When astronomers detect some kind of ordered “pulse” from space, they automatically hope it’s evidence of aliens. In fact, objects known as pulsars were originally called “LGM.” This stood for “little green men” because researchers thought the pulses must be from aliens. But pulsars are now believed to be rapidly rotating neutron stars.

Scientists are eagerly looking for evidence of alien life to prove we’re not alone. But here on earth, we have DNA—a complex language system. It couldn’t have originated by itself. Yet that’s what most scientists believe! They ignore the striking evidence for the Designer because, well, they’re willfully ignorant."

That's right you atheists, "willfully ignorant". Let that sink in.

And before you start babbling about "blind assertions" and "logical fallacies", let me point out the source of this righteousness.

Drum roll please..........

That's right, this cannot be refuted. It's from that Deacon of knowledge himself, yes, the leader of Answers in Genesis, the anointed one. Get ready for it...........

Ken Ham.

Need I say more? Put that in your crack pipes and smoke it you willfully ignorant atheists.

LOL...too funny. Ken Hamburgler...LOL Cuh Mon mate, lets throw a couple dinosaurs on the dingy, the tikes will go bonkers over it.

Sourcecodewizard

Why have you avoided my questions from page 1....

"When Jesus spoke of His Father. That's the one."

Is it also the one from Genesis? The one in the Garden who claims to be our creator?

If your response is yes, I am ready to challenge that by using your very own books through logic and the scriptures in Genesis.

New Question added: Are you a Scientologist?

Well I see source has finally realized he could not win.

rmfr