Stupid Big Bang

116 posts / 0 new
Last post
A.prophet's picture
Stupid Big Bang

In the beginning, cosmologists explained that the universe began from an explosion they called "The Big Bang". The first scientific writings explained that it all began from the collision of 2 atoms at the speed of light and therefore the Hadron Collider was built to recreate the scenario of the beginning. Unfortunately for them, the results were insufficient and therefore the writings have change omitting any kind of collision, yet they still claim that the universe began from a massive explosion. How could that be? Doesn't make sense. If the Hadron Collider was wrong, then the theory as a whole should be wrong too.

In the Quran, Allah explains that the composition of space's dark void was only composed of smoke and is derived to be purely Hydrogen and Helium. Someone may ask about the origin of the hydrogen and helium and truthfully I don't know, the only explanation I could give for the time being is Allah. Quantum physics may try figuring out that mystery but I personally believe that it will end up with Allah once again. But surprisingly, working with hydrogen and helium and what mathematics and some stellar and chemical givens helps solve the equation.

Hydrogen composes 75% of space while helium is 25%. Searches on google would provide a range of 1%-3% of all other elements but that is just the remnants of dead stars which hardly have any place in this discussion or any other stellar discussion. Unlike any theory, the big bang is just a cluster of random events that do not correspond with one another to produce a common ancestor like the theory of evolution for example. But if the sciences are fit together like the pieces of a puzzle, a definitive picture appears. I began with hydrogen and helium to emphasize that everything in the universe is originally a product of the two.
Nebulae are split into 4 main types... Planetary, Dark, HII (hydrogen 2) & supernova remnants. I shall start with the Planetary nebula.

Cosmologists have split planetary nebulae into subcategories based on the shape of the nebula, but that was a mistake they should've realized. Unfortunately I can only attach one picture to this discussion and so it will be to show the similarities between the planetary nebula subcategories, the rest of the information should be searched by you. In the picture attached you see 4 different planetary nebulae as explained by cosmologist, but in reality they are all the same only taken from different angles. The original shape of a planetary nebula is the tubular shape on the top left. If that is the case, then what is the process?

I shall refrain from explaining what cosmologist have deduced about the creation of a planetary nebula and go ahead and explain mine.
Even though space may look calm from the where we stand, it is filled with unseen actions and reactions, most important of them all is wind. Stellar winds reach speeds nothing on land can withstand and are the major players in the creation of planetary nebulae. Thermodynamics explains that when a liquid or a gas is pushed through a choke point, the choke point causes a decrease in pressure and increase in velocity of the liquid or gas pushed through the choke point known as the Venturi effect. Smoke in it's nature has a twisting tendency, and in space, the 2 elements being pushed through a naturally occurring choke point are hydrogen and helium. Hydrogen is highly flammable and helium is inert. helium protects the hydrogen from entering open space so as to prevent the ignition of space. As the winds increase, the highly flammable hydrogen lights up with heat forming a star like structure which cosmologists assumed was a Red Giant Star dying. From this heated center explodes a galaxy perpendicular to the Planetary nebula which starts as a Dark nebula then an HII nebula due to its visibility and dies out as a Supernova.

Cosmologist have claimed that they have found the origin of the big bang and apparently have taken a picture of it, pictures could be found of it on google. If that is true, then they have taken the picture of the middle of our Planetary nebula which ejected the Milky way. For that reason, the diagrams given for the shape of the universe are similar to that of half a planetary nebula. Cosmologist would not find any planetary nebulae in the direction of the center of out galaxy, but will find everything else in the other direction.

Again... this article is summarized and explicit detail could be given about each process and the reactions within them. All found in the Quran

لا إله إلا الله

Attachments

Yes

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

CyberLN's picture
Well, I haven’t yet gotten

Well, I haven’t yet gotten past your first sentence: “In the beginning, cosmologists explained that the universe began from an explosion they called "The Big Bang". ”

Please name one cosmologist who says that the Big Bang was an explosion.

A.prophet's picture
You're really annoying and

You're really annoying and dumb.

CyberLN's picture
“I would like 1 decent chat

“I would like 1 decent chat with an atheist ”....I guess not.

A.prophet's picture
Then leave!

Then leave!

Tin-Man's picture
@Mohamed Re: "Then leave!"

@Mohamed Re: "Then leave!"

Pssst... Hey, Cool Daddy Shades..... *whistle*... *raising hand*.... Hey, over here!.... *waving hand back and forth*.... Yeah, here! Take off those fly looking Ray Ban rip-offs and you might be able to see better. Anyway, in case you have forgotten, this is OUR home, not yours. Please feel free to take your own advice at any time. Yes, yes, I may shed a few tears upon your departure, but I will somehow manage to survive. Think not of me, though. My heart has been broken before. I'll recover. You must do what is best for YOU.

If anybody needs me, I'll be in my room eating a gallon of double-chocolate chunk ice cream and binge watching reruns of "The Love Boat".... *dramatically turns and walks away toward bedroom*....

CyberLN's picture
Mohamed, I asked you a

Mohamed, I asked you a legitimate question about an assertion you made. I asked you to back it up and your response was to call me a derisive name. When I then pointed out that your very first post said you were looking for a decent discussion, you tell me to leave. How do you think that makes you appear to the other posters here? Does it bolster our confidence that anything you have to has merit? You knocked on our door and when you e been asked to back up what you’re selling, you engage in any number of avoidance behaviors. Put up or shut up, Mohamed, because, so far, you’ve offered bupkus.

A.prophet's picture
Could I know your name?

Could I know your name?

1. The very first discussion was about the roundness of the sun. All who posted explained that the article I gave a link too did not say that the sun was not round, yet it did say that the sun was round to 0.001%. In science, that is an incomplete number and therefore I said that the sun was not round. I didn't know that you wanted exact wordings and when I used oblate spheroid or oblate ellipsoid, I was again ridiculed. It is almost as if you just want to to shut up. If you guys don't want this I will happily leave. There are no children between us.
But then it was followed by a further explanation why the sun was not as sound as it should be... that was also dismissed for the reason of the first OP. 1 word was the reason for all the bullshit I'm getting from you guys in all topics. I'm looking for an educated argument, not a bunch of retards that cuss and make unnecessary remarks.

2. The number of people reading my discussions increase by the minute. Sure, I'm not getting much discussion, but at least they are decent enough to keep to their own.

It's either you have an educated answer or you have nothing... you have none of those.

Even though I did not make a mistake in the first OP, but if I say that I made a mistake... would you leave me alone?

CyberLN's picture
Once again, avoidance.

Once again, avoidance.

A.prophet's picture
Please repeat your question

Please repeat your question

CyberLN's picture
Please name one cosmologist

Please name one cosmologist who says that the Big Bang was an explosion.

A.prophet's picture
Neil DeGrasse Tyson

Neil DeGrasse Tyson

CyberLN's picture
Please provide a link to him

Please provide a link to him saying that the Big Bang was an explosion.

A.prophet's picture
https://www.youtube.com/watch
arakish's picture
@ Mo

@ Mo

You are so full of shit. Neil's EXACT words are "it's been expanding ever since." He has never, ever said the universe started with a big bang or explosion. Just like any Religious Absolutist, you barely know anything about what you speak. You are doing nothing but showing your own ignorance and illiteracy. Perhaps if you should do more research.

Long before you even thought of itching your daddy's loins, I have spent over 50 years studying cosmology, astrophysics, celestial mechanics to list only a few of the pertinent fields of science.

The actual name of the theory you speak of is the Universal Expansion Theory. The term "big bang" was a derogative term used to disparage the theory. However, the term "big bang" became a popular term, more so than Universal Expansion Theory.

If you actually did more reading and studying in things besides that book of lies, you might would have know this.

rmfr

Sapporo's picture
@Mohamed are our names

@Mohamed are our names especially important?

Although I suppose if I only knew your name, I would have correctly guessed your religious beliefs.

A.prophet's picture
Just want to be formal

Just want to be formal

There are atheist Mohameds

Tin-Man's picture
@Mohamed Slick Re: "Could I

@Mohamed Slick Re: "Could I know your name?"

You can call her Miss Business. Her first name is Nunya.

Tin-Man's picture
@Mohamed Re: To Cyber -

@Mohamed Re: To Cyber - "You're really annoying and dumb."

Interesting you feel that way, because Cyber happens to be a very well respected Mod on here. Myself, on the other hand..... *snicker*... Well, let's just say you really have NO IDEA yet what annoying TRULY is.... *evil grin*..... And as an extra added bonus, I just happen to be in a really good mood lately. Happy-happy joy-joy!... *Big Smile*....

A.prophet's picture
You have the time to put

You have the time to put snickers between stars but no time to make a clear scientific comeback?... I guess illiteracy is existent worldwide

Why do your countries claim knowledge... or even having knowledgeable people.

pshhhh

Tin-Man's picture
@Cool Daddy Mohamed Re:

@Cool Daddy Mohamed Re: "Why do your countries claim knowledge... or even having knowledgeable people."

What country? I'm from somewhere Over the Rainbow, dude. A little place called Oz. Maybe you've heard of it? Be that as it may, in all fairness I must admit most folks there are rather..... ummmm.... uh, "eccentric"? (Yeah, that would be a nice way of saying it.) So, personally, I really don't make any claims of knowledge. Besides, you are the one coming in here making all the grand claims about being such an expert on Cosmology and Physics and such. I'm just a common Average Joe, though, so I humbly bow to your regurgitated bottomless pit of superfluous intellect. (Whatever that means... *shrugging shoulders*...)

A.prophet's picture
If you are common average joe

If you are common average joe, then why attack what you don't know?

That is what I've been saying from the beginning... If I ask you how you are doing, the answer should be along the lines of fine or not fine... not random and off topic,

arakish's picture
@ Mo

@ Mo

And why are you trying to promote yourself as an expert on cosmology when every last post you have made shows you know absolutely nothing about it. You lie, you cheat, you probably steal too (meaning plagiarize). All because you know nothing except what is in that book of lies you call the Qu'ran.

For one, the Big Bang was NOT the beginning of the universe. It was the beginning of the Universal Expansion Phase. Someone needs to go back to school and quit skipping classes.

Oh. Does your father know you are using his picture to pose as him?

rmfr

Sky Pilot's picture
The Big Bang is just a silly

The Big Bang is just a silly Catholic theory of creation. Some people say that it is the expansion of stuff. The result is the same.

A.prophet's picture
Expansion is true but

Expansion is true but different than what you know

Sky Pilot's picture
Mohamed,

Mohamed,

"Expansion is true but different than what you know"

So what caused the expansion, reverse gravity? Gravity attracts, it doesn't repel.

A.prophet's picture
Before I begin explaining...

Before I begin explaining... did you read the topic of this discussion or will I have to repeat what has already been written?

arakish's picture
Mo: "Expansion is true but

Mo: "Expansion is true but different than what you know"

And it is different that what you know.

rmfr

Tin-Man's picture
Had to stop reading the OP

Had to stop reading the OP after just two sentences. Started losing IQ points at an exponential rate. Pretty sure a few brain cells were destroyed in the process. Owwwwww......

(Note to self: No more reading OP's from Mohamed.)

Edit to add: I blame myself, really. The OP title alone should have been the first clue.

arakish's picture
Don't feel bad Tin-Man. I

Don't feel bad Tin-Man. I only skimmed it and I think I lost about 50 IQ points just skimming such stupid and moronic nonsense.

rmfr

Nyarlathotep's picture
That was some pretty crazy

That was some pretty crazy stuff. Reading it made me feel like I was intoxicated.

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.