@triumph
Ahh, okay. So you strongly disagree with his personal views. Yes, you did mention that. You think he is sexist and racist and, I agree those things are not cool.

Now pay attention to what I'm not saying as much as to what I am saying... I don't support Trump myself, first of all, but the evidence of him being racist is not very strong. In fact it's a little less than the evidence against. Until we can prove that he is, I don't think it's fair to accuse him. Mind you, this has nothing to do with policies and what he had actually done as president... Just what he believes, which we don't know for certain. Sexist. Maybe a stronger case can be made. So make that case. Most of us will likely agree. You haven't supplied evidence... I think that's the major problem here. I won't accuse anyone of such a thing unless I knew it with a great degree of certainty. But maybe you do... I was nasty only because you haven't actually provided that evidence or even made a good argument. Like I said, you're probably right, just tell us about it. Next is the psychopath and narcissist kind of claims. Unless you are a psychologist and you have examined him personally I cannot accept your diagnosis. I can entertain a good argument though... But you haven't given one for that either.

More to the point... What about his actions as president? What do you have an issue with? I'll even help you out... He's a climate change denier and that's a dangerous position to hold on this era. For example he is trying to reform coal mines and do pointless stupid things such as drill more oil instead of focusing on alternative energy. Because he doesn't think it's important. There you go. That's one good reason you can use. For me to give you a hard time about this is incredible. I just don't like baseless assertions. And it would be a double standard to hold theists to that when they make their claims and then not hold you and everyone else to that same standard.

Do you get what I'm saying now?

I don't think your grasp of politics is sufficient to pursue this topic to be honest, but you might want to consider whether the Republicans support of a Republican candidate is unconditional and extends to every thing he says or every view he holds. I imagine their primary concern was winning the election with the most electable candidate. You might also want to ask yourself whether making generalisations about every single Republican is a sensible cogent criticism, or just simply hyperbolic rhetoric, as I have tried to make you understand.

As Aposti has mentioned most people here probably would agree with many of your criticisms of Trump. However you are going hopelessly overboard with rhetoric like psychopath and insane. It's also pretty stupid to come into a forum for debate and start making claims then lose your temper and start insulting people when they dispute your claims. You don't seem to know the difference between deriding a claim or an idea, and pure ad hominem.