CONSCIOUSNESS

92 posts / 0 new
Last post
Nyarlathotep's picture
If a dead body is physical

If a dead body is physically identical to a living body; then there would be no way to tell them apart.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Can you tell if the neurons

Can you tell if the neurons in the attached image are dead or alive?

Attachments

Attach Image/Video?: 

Yes
chimp3's picture
If those neurons are on a

If those neurons are on a glass slide, my guess is dead!

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Yeah lol, they're also Nissl

Yeah lol, they're also Nissl stained, so if they weren't dead before they are now.

chimp3's picture
Can you tell if neurons in a

Can you tell if neurons in a living person are dead or alive through PET / CT Scans with contrast?

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Man, I forgot they each do. I

Man, I forgot what they each do. I would say PET yes, but CT no.

chimp3's picture
CT Scans identify regions of

CT Scans identify regions of atrophy, damage from infarction.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Right, but its just fancy X

Right, but its just a fancy X-Ray so it wouldn't tell you if the person is dead. PET scan is the one I never understood what its for. The only thing you ever hear mentioned in psych is an fMRI.

chimp3's picture
The topic is whether we can

The topic is whether we can tell if individual neurons are dead. Not the person. I thought, anyway.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Oh, then I don't believe any

Oh, then I don't believe any of these methods can be used. Neurons are microscopic, and these imaging devices are macroscopic. You wouldn't even see one, let alone tell if its alive.

chimp3's picture
If a CT Scan reveals atrophy

If a CT Scan reveals atrophy in the prefrontal cortex then are there not dead neurons in that region. If a CT scan reveals damage from an infarction, there must be dead neurons. That is what atrophy means. Dead cells.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Right, then that's what I

Right, then that's what I meant to say when I said person. I meant the brain of the person. You're not looking at the individual neurons either, you're looking at scar tissue composed of dead neurons. If a neurons dies without scarring it wouldn't show up on a CT scan.

Isn't it either ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes that doesn't show on a CT scan?

chimp3's picture
Ischemia is caused by

Ischemia is caused by occlusion or hemorrhage. Dead is dead.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
No, ischemic strokes are by

No, ischemic strokes are by occlusion and hemorrhagic strokes are by bleeding. One of them doesn't show on CT.

chimp3's picture
I think you are wrong. A CT

I think you are wrong. A CT scan is a rapid way to determine if a stroke victim is a candidate for anti-thrombolytic therapy.

chimp3's picture
Images of both hemorrhagic

Images of both hemorrhagic and occlusive ischemia : http://www.radiologyassistant.nl/en/p483910a4b6f14/brain-ischemia-imagin...

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Yeah, I'll look it up to see

Yeah, I'll look it up to see where I heard it, maybe I'm confusing it with another imaging technique.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Nope, I wasn't able to find

Nope, I wasn't able to find it.

Nyarlathotep's picture
No I can't. Now that we've

No I can't. Now that we've covered that: why don't you address your very false claims that there is no physical differences between a dead body and a live body.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Take it easy Sheldon.

Dang Sheldon, don't forget the fancy adjectives, like asinine.

There aren't any physical differences between a dead body and a living body, unless you're going full Scrooge and say a decapitated head is a physical distinction. You distinguish between the two physiologically, by observing its functions, not physically by observing its anatomy.

Tin-Man's picture
If I may interject here a

If I may interject here a moment, having been a medic with the military, this discussion has been much fun to follow so far. Thank you, gentlemen. Carry on.

Nyarlathotep's picture
John 6IX Breezy - unless you

John 6IX Breezy - unless you're going full Scrooge and say a decapitated head is a physical distinction

Well call me Scrooge McDuck then because a missing head is certainly a physical distinction.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
Certainly, unfortunately

Certainly, unfortunately decapitation has been on decline since the French Revolution. So you'll need a better diagnostic technique.

Nyarlathotep's picture
I'm not offering diagnostic

I'm not offering diagnostic techniques. I'm pointing out that if there are no physical differences between two systems, then there is ABSOLUTELY no way to tell them apart.

I'm pointing out that what you have said on the matter is totally wrong.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
If that's your argument

If that's your argument (technically its mine, since I forwarded first) I'll take it. Now, you seem to be agreeing with me: If there are no physical differences between the two, then there is no physical way to tell the two apart. I argued for a physiological distinction.

It seems like you should be arguing that the two are never identical. Pointing to one instance in which they aren't, doesn't invalidate every instance in which they are.

Nyarlathotep's picture
I only need one exception to

I only need one exception to your statement to prove by counterexample that what you said is wrong. I leave the rest to the medical professionals.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
This is where I get accused

This is where I get accused of word games. Typically when you take this approach you latch on to your favorite go-to words (never, always, absolutely, etc.). Did I use any of them, and if I didn't, why would one exception invalidate my statement?

Nyarlathotep's picture
John; I can't take any more

John; I can't take any more mental gymnastics right now. You just keep believing there is no physical differences between dead bodies and living bodies. Good luck with that.

ʝօɦռ 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐʏ's picture
I'll take it.

I accept your resignation.

Sky Pilot's picture
John 6IX Breezy,

John 6IX Breezy,

According to literature when a corpse comes back as a zombie it can hear, see, walk, grab things, eat and even grunt but it can't talk. So from a moral pov is it a criminal act to shot them in the head?

According to the biblical fairy tale zombie Yeshua even held long conversations with his buddies. But there's no mention of anything that zombie Lazarus did after he came out of the tomb after being dead for four days. Is he still "living"?

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.