Does everything have a start?

342 posts / 0 new
Last post
Randomhero1982's picture
1. Unproven by science as of
Ramo Mpq's picture
Hi Randomhero,
toto974's picture
What would be the other way?
toto974's picture
What would be the other way?
Randomhero1982's picture
Firstly, before I answer, I'd
Devans99's picture
I defined nothing as no
Randomhero1982's picture
Ok, now demonstrate that
Ramo Mpq's picture
@Random
Randomhero1982's picture
I think I made my position
Ramo Mpq's picture
@random
Randomhero1982's picture
Of course, but I do believe
Devans99's picture
You have to look at the size
CyberLN's picture
Dan, you have asserted, “I've
Sheldon's picture
I always find it amusing when
Ramo Mpq's picture
@Randomhero
Sheldon's picture
"I think its logical to
David Killens's picture
@Searching for truth
Ramo Mpq's picture
@David,
David Killens's picture
The problem is that nothing
Sheldon's picture
"Why would I lean on any
Sheldon's picture
I thought you didn't care
toto974's picture
What is this other tool? How
Ramo Mpq's picture
I'm talking science,
Sapporo's picture
Searching for truth: I'm
Ramo Mpq's picture
If you think science, logic
Sheldon's picture
" So I 100% support science I
Devans99's picture
1. Widely accepted axiom
Randomhero1982's picture
You still have not
Devans99's picture
I've demonstrated that
Nyarlathotep's picture
Dan - ...it just you who does

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.