Existence part 2

93 posts / 0 new
Last post
AJ777's picture
I agree the law of non
Peripatetic's picture
If anything were to exist,
Peripatetic's picture
And here we have three
Nyarlathotep's picture
AJ777 - ...the precise nature
Drewcgs11's picture
I have stated:
Nyarlathotep's picture
ZERO - ...you say I should
Flamenca's picture
Yes, @Zero, you stated 2 ways
Drewcgs11's picture
"when dying"
Flamenca's picture
@Zero. A living being who
Drewcgs11's picture
@Angiebot
Flamenca's picture
@Zero, if an animal dies, it
Drewcgs11's picture
@Angiebot
Flamenca's picture
@Zero: those existing
Drewcgs11's picture
@Angiebot
Flamenca's picture
@Zero:
Drewcgs11's picture
@Angiebot
Keith Raye's picture
@Zero
Drewcgs11's picture
@Keith Raye
AJ777's picture
https://www.discovery.org/f
mykcob4's picture
@AJ777
Nyarlathotep's picture
discovery.org - The strong
Nyarlathotep's picture
No response?
AJ777's picture
Your claim is that the
Nyarlathotep's picture
OK fine.
AJ777's picture
Can you give an example of an
Nyarlathotep's picture
Sure:
AJ777's picture
So you’ve proved that you can
Nyarlathotep's picture
No; I demonstrated that
AJ777's picture
I appreciate your knowledge
LostLocke's picture
The article is the one making

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.