If one claims that 'using logic and reason to prove your logic and reason is actually logic and reason is circular reasoning and is no different than saying the bible proves the bible is circular reasoning' how can one respond definitively that this concept is a fallacy?
He has already been told by numerous people that he is basically making shit up to defend his position, but I can't seem to think of a definitive explanation as to why making such a claim is wrong, illogical or unreasonable.
Tried posting this same question on a blog on this site but I don't think it worked so thought I'd try it here.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Subscription Note:
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.
