Is materialism a real theory? Do most atheist believe in it?

399 posts / 0 new
Last post
dxm_dxm's picture
Is materialism a real theory? Do most atheist believe in it?

A theory is an explanation behind a claim, an explanation preferably supported by scientific evidence. For example the theory of evolution is certainly a real theory and, on top of being a real theory, is supported by a ton of strong evidence and scientific facts.

Not the same can be said about materialism - the claim that consciousness comes from matter.

There is no theory behind this claim, not even an attempt at a theory. When it comes to evidence, there is none because you don't even have a theory to begin with - you don't even have a theory that evidence could possibly support.

So, as atheist, what is your opinion about the idea that consciousness comes from matter ? Do you believe in it, despite no theory being behind it, let alone evidence to back that theory ?

Atheism is not the same as materialism - it only means not believing in the existence of a god, especially not without some kind of theory or evidence behind this claim. One can be an atheist without believing in materialism.

So what are your opinions about materialism ? Can you believe in this claim without 1) a theory and 2) evidence to support it ? Can you believe it it based purely on intuition ?

Attachments

No

Subscription Note: 

Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.

Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.

xenoview's picture
Your consciousness comes from
dxm_dxm's picture
The argument you brought up
Sapporo's picture
dxm_dxm: The argument you
xenoview's picture
Your consciousness is
dxm_dxm's picture
And without consciousness,
xenoview's picture
Consciousness requires a
Nyarlathotep's picture
dxm_dxm - And without
Senta Christine's picture
Not proven. No one knows
arakish's picture
But I do. Neurotransmitters.
Cognostic's picture
I thought nature abhorred a
Nyarlathotep's picture
Cognostic - I thought nature
Sheldon's picture
So what? Science couldn't
Senta Christine's picture
Also the paramecium has
Sheldon's picture
"Also the paramecium has
Sapporo's picture
@dxm_dxm that is a very
dxm_dxm's picture
"Define what you mean by
David Killens's picture
Actually, you are deep into
SunDog's picture
Consciousness is an emergent
dxm_dxm's picture
"""I think materialism is a
Sheldon's picture
"Materialism claims
dxm_dxm's picture
"You mean other than the
CyberLN's picture
Does an ant have
CyberLN's picture
And, btw, an ant brain has
ʝօɦn 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐy's picture
Lol suddenly you're a
CyberLN's picture
Actually, it’s called
ʝօɦn 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐy's picture
No; I find your "I'm not
CyberLN's picture
John, I have no idea what you
ʝօɦn 6IX ɮʀɛɛʐy's picture
Read it a few more times.
CyberLN's picture
No thanks.
arakish's picture
Except when you write it.

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.