Hey guys. This time I'm here to talk about "randomness" and "luck". No offense but Walter does have a good point. "Randomness" and "Chance" is not a way to describe certain situations. When something is random, it is considered "out of nowhere". Athiests who use that as a means for the origins of the universe is being ignorant. Randomness and Luck are terms for people who cannot predict the future or know what's happening. If you know it happened or is going to happen, then it's no longer random because you expect it. Applying that logic for the origins of the universe just as a excuse to disprove God is in of itself is ignorant because it only makes that person look like a stupid asshole. No offense, but I do agree with some of Walter's arguments, since he at least does have a point on when it comes to the "logic" and "rational thought" that this Atheist community claims it has. Keep in mind, I am only saying I agree with SOME of Walter's points. NOT ALL of them.
Choosing to subscribe to this topic will automatically register you for email notifications for comments and updates on this thread.
Email notifications will be sent out daily by default unless specified otherwise on your account which you can edit by going to your userpage here and clicking on the subscriptions tab.