servantofallah: "I get it, but he is an Oxford mathematician."

Similar to what Nyarlathotep said: "So fucking what?"

He is foremost a Religious Absolutist. Remember the definition I gave you for Religious Absolutists? No?

“Religious Absolutist – anyone belonging to and possessing an inexorable belief in any religion because of their inability to utilize critical thinking, logical and deductive reasoning, and rational and analytical thought, due to the Abrahamic absolutist beliefs, and is truly applicable to any inexorable religious believers, especially the worst subset, Apologists.”

“Religious Apologist – a dastardly subset of the Religious Absolutists who practices apologetics, which is the assumption of presupposed conclusions that have nothing to do with reason and rationality and actual information and reality, creating irrational excuses and whatever conflicting ideas justifying their baseless assumptions, regardless of what the true facts are, through the use of beguiling dialectical semantics, distorted and perverted data, emotional whiney-ass pleas, due to an indoctrinational conditioning that is so ingrained they never question the veracity of the nonsense they offer, or why they need to defend their faith at all.”

So, if you "get it," why even mention he is an Oxford Mathematician. Want to know about how many classes in college I dropped simply due to the fact that the professor was a Religious Absolutist completely incapable of keeping their religiosity out of the classroom? About a dozen. And every last one of them was in the "liberal arts" category of art, english composition, languages, sociology, etc. Basically anything that was NOT "science" based. Why is it these liberal arts professors cannot keep their damned religiosity out of influencing their teachings? It is ONLY the science professors that are intelligent enough to either keep their religiosity out of their teachings, or they just are not religious.

Thus, my question. Why the fuck do you even want to know what us atheists think of someone who is clearly delusional? And to answer you upcoming question, anyone who is supposedly as intelligent as Lennox, yet deluded by religion is clearly delusional. And before you ask for yourself, "If the shoe fits..."

rmfr

@SofA Re: "I get it, but he is an Oxford mathematician."

And Kermit the Frog is green. What's your point?

"I get it, but he is an Oxford mathematician."

Do you know what an appeal to authority fallacy is? It is when you cite someone's opinion on something as validated purely based on their reputation, often in an unrelated field, as you are doing here.

Unless of course you're saying John Lennox has produced a peer reviewed mathematical proof that supports the existence of a deity?

I've just scoured the internet and the entire world seems to have missed it is that is what you're claiming, and if it's not what you're claiming then like everyone else I'm at a loss as to what point your making by asking atheists their opinions on a mathematician?