It would be wise to simply pick up on the fact that a claim is not evidence. This has been explained over and over and over again to you. CLAIMS are not the EVIDENCE of an event. CLAIMS piled atop MORE CLAIMS still does not equal evidence. A billion bad claims do not equal one good piece of evidence.

Even if someone paralyzed at Lourdes and became healed there that would just be a coincidence almost for certain. It would have to keep happening. Maybe the patient was misdiagnosed and was never really paralyzed, maybe she's a faker.

Until the healing keeps happening and we see e.g. a regrown limb Lourdes is nonsense.

Also my universal argument: How could a God without a brain or neurons do a healing? He would have no knowledge of how to heal without neurons.

@Cognostic: He wouldn't be able to manifest in physical form without thinking and without having the knowledge of how to do that. Knowledge in intelligent beings comes from the brain. There's no evidence where there should be that you think or have knowledge without a brain. You are simply wrong. However the counter to my argument is that God is all-powerful so that he can do anything: How can he be all powerful if we humans are so badly designed?

It's called inference to best explanation: God contradicts science.

Don't be rude and tell me to shut my face you prick.

@Cognostic: "Read the previous post. All you did was repeat yourself. I have already demonstrated a God capable of being physical."

I have already shown you that God can't be physical if he doesn't have the knowledge of how to be physical. I didn't repeat myself entirely I added to the argument, your claim that I entirely repeated myself is clearly false. Please come up with a counter to my counter or shut up.

" Being all powerful in no way asserts that every single thing you do is going to be of the best quality possible."

But no all-powerful God would design us this way that's the point you're missing, DUH. It makes this God look as if he is not all-powerful: In fact it makes it look as if we were created by something with no higher intelligence whatsoever. So the all powerful claim is bunk.

"Sometimes, good enough is enough. Do you do every single thing you do to the best of your ability. NO/ "

For an all powerful God it would be effortless for him to create us without flaws. We don't do things to the best of our abilities all the time because it takes so much more effort for us to do so. Again, for God it would be effortless. This leaves a huge question mark over poor design. God cannot likely be all-powerful or even have the power of humans: Even humans are starting to design things better than the human body, slowly but surely. On top of this God has no brain AND is supposed to be intelligent? How on Earth could God create a universe.

"Not only is my god capable of human form but he does not give a shit about you or the way you function. You were a frigging accident. "

How can God be capable of human form if he doesn't have the "all" - knowledge of how to turn himself into a human? No brain/neurons, no knowledge. Makes no sense at all. An accident? God is supposed to have created us on purpose you idiot.

"All you are doing is making erroneous claims about the god thing. SPEAKING AS AN ATHEIST - you are an embarrassment to atheism."

You are slowly going to realize that all the arguments that you use for atheism were a waste of time and you could have just used the Common Sense Atheism approach instead of the shit New Atheist approach.

Again, the entire argument is called inference to best explanation and is what scientists use. It's a much easier way of debunking God than you're used to. You're just wrong and that, "atheist brother", is embarrassing.

" I have already shown you that God can't be physical.
I have already demonstrated a physical god. I gave you 3 specific examples and you have cited nothing but an erroneous opinion. "

How can God be all powerful without a brain or neurons? An intelligences power source is largely the brain. How can God become physical without a brain or neurons? He wouldn't have the knowledge of how to do so or be able to think of how to do such a thing.

Again my argument is a simple way of beating all arguments for God and you have shown no evidence that God can think thoughts/have knowledge/be all powerful without a brain or neurons.

The reason you don't believe in Santa Claus is because there's no evidence where there should be for him. The same with God: There's no evidence where there should be that you can think thoughts or have knowledge or have power without a brain/neurons.

The rest of your post is inane gibberish.

EDIT: Remember my main argument is the same as others: There is no evidence for God where there should be. But how to COUNTER all arguments for God? The above "no brain" argument beats ALL arguments for God and simply.

@Remember my main argument is the same as others: There is no evidence for God where there should be.

You don't have a main argument. How in the fuck would you know what "should be" without defining the god you are talking about. All your are doing is making inane bullshit assertions. Just like an idiot theist. YOU ARE THE KIND OF PERSON THAT GIVES ATHEISM A BAD NAME. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE DOING.