SomeBODIEShero "You proclaimed I am anti woman with no basis to your claim."

Fairly sure this was the basis of the accusation.

Mon, 04/29/2019 - 14:53 (Reply to #27)
SomeBODIEShero growing inside a mothers womb, there by consequence of the mothers poor CHOICE,

@ Nobody's Hero

“Okay. Let sift through another annoyingly long and convoluted post by Arakish to find the juice of the matter.”

Yeah, let's sift through another Religious Absolutist's annoying failure.

“First of all, you are quoting what I said some religious people believe as justification to being pro life. If you “use critically thinking” you’ll quickly realize I NEVER said those were my beliefs. All I said was I was pro life.”

However, every post you make is nothing but Religious Absolutist Propoganda. As I have alluded to many times, no Religious Absolutist can do, say, or write anything without letting their absolute religous beliefs shine through. And you did say it was also your belief. Go back re-read what you wrote. As said, no matter how hard you try, your Religious Absolutism is there for any and every person to see.

“Second. You keep calling me a religious absolutist, when there is zero evidence to me being as such. If I was a scientific journal, I wouldn’t let your dissertation 100 yards from my publication. Maybe you should go back to school and earn a fifth degree of science, and you might learn how to provide evidence before making a claim.”

Also see above. I seriously doubt you even know what a scientific journal is, let alone a dissertation. I do not need to go back to school. The degrees I have already account for that. Besides, I already work in the field I have studied in: Yellowstone Volcano Observatory as Field Technician and Volcanology Analyst.

As for evidence of being a Religious Absolutist, I do not need to provide any since you have provided ALL that is needed in all your asinine, inane, risible, fallacious, and Religious Absolutist posts. All one need do is go back through all your posts.

Thus, why should I provide the evidence you have so graciously supplied.

“Third. As I stated before, I personally gave arguments for pro life with ZERO religious reasons. So keep your filthy Old Testament interpretations away from the conversations and provide me some humane and secular reasons why you think it okay to have an abortion.”

Lie. You did NOT give any arguments without religion until your fourth post with this list:
1) Abstinence (like that'll happen!)
2) Free/cheap Contraception (why ain't you on the streets handing it out then?)
3) Adoption (have you?)
4) Motherhood (ever tried?)

Until here, everything you posted is religious. As is everything after your fourth post.

BTW: You forgot one. Arnold Palmer and his five sisters.

“Okay. We have come to the crux of your argument. You say life is when the cells are viable. You do realize scientist have been growing cells in a petri dish for years... right? That would make them viable from day one. But for your sake, we’ll pretend that’s not true. So what would you say? A fetus is viable outside the mother as early as 24 weeks, thanks to science. Would you at least publicly condemn abortions after 24 weeks?”

And this paragraph does nothing but show your lack of knowledge. Go back to school yourself and learn some biology. Now to bust it down.

“You say life is when the cells are viable.”

Another favorite tactic of a Religious Absolutist. Remember that list I gave you?

• They LIE without ever thinking about the veracity of their statement.
• They LIE by being absolute in their statements.
• They LIE by using beguiling dialectical semantics.
• ⇒ They LIE by using distorted and perverted data.
• ⇒ They LIE by making accusations they never apologize for even when they are proven wrong.

With everything above this line of text, you have matched five. Two of them you matched with “You say life is when the cells are viable.” I NEVER said any such thing. I just wished you Religious Absolutists were such bald-faced LIARS! Go back and read it again. Try to at least use some Reading Comprehension since you seem incapable of critical thinking.

I said exactly, “The actual standard for the beginning of life is when it is viable. When it can exist without life support.”

As compared to, “You say life is when the cells are viable.” Go someplace else with your lies, deceptions, duplicity, hypocrisy, and treasonous treachery. And don't apologize. It would be nothing but an insult. As if you ain't thrown enough already.

You once said I was “full of shit.” Care to look in that mirror before saying it again? Who is the one has been “full of shit” since his first post?

“You do realize scientist have been growing cells in a petri dish for years... right?”

Really? When did they start doing that? Oh, I know, back when I was a child and had to chase Tyrannosaurs from my backyard so my three younger siblings could play. Probably before you ever itched your daddy's loins.

“That would make them viable from day one.”

Wrong.

“But for your sake, we’ll pretend that’s not true.”

Pretend what is not true? I don't pretend. Except in one possible scenario. Everbody: $10 says he can't guess it.

“So what would you say?”

Whopnobberdoogledorf.

“A fetus is viable outside the mother as early as 24 weeks, thanks to science.”

Wrong.

“Would you at least publicly condemn abortions after 24 weeks?”

No.

============================================================

And on another further note. I act and say what I say here being my true self. When I am at work, I am probably more professional than you could ever wish I weren't. I come to these boards to be "myself." Don't like it? You know where the door is.

I come to these boards so I do not have to be the snobbish stuck up snitwit that you seem to be emulating. And evidently you ain't never heard of Christopher Hitchens. Exactly like him, I do not give a damn whether anything I say is offensive. In my over 55 years of life, I have learned one true truth: One cannot say/write ANYTHING of substance without offending someone somewhere sometime.

Arakish: “Only YOU can give anything the power to offend YOU!”

And as Stephen Fry once said, “It’s very common to hear people say, ‘I’m rather offended by that.’ As if that gives them certain rights. It’s actually nothing more … than a whine. ‘I find that offensive.’ It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. ‘I am offended by that.’ Well, so fucking what.”

And to you specifically Nobody's Hero, I say, "Offended? Well, so fucking what."

rmfr

I don’t understand how you can consider one fetus a person (when it’s ‘her’ fault) making abortion a murder and then not (rape/assault - not ‘her’ fault) making it acceptable. That’s just such a dichotomy.

To me, this is a very obvious indication that pregnancy-as-punishment is the root of your anti-choice stance.

I wonder if you are the madonna-whore complex with feet.