Fine-tuning of physical constants

107 posts / 0 new
Last post
Peurii's picture
The fine tuning argument is
Sky Pilot's picture
Such questions as this are
Cognostic's picture
Douglas Adams had a great
stillwater's picture
It is indeed difficult to
David Killens's picture
@adragonist
stillwater's picture
I advise you once more to
Someone's picture
I cannot see how the best
arakish's picture
And my argument is that those
Someone's picture
I think you could do with
Nyarlathotep's picture
Someone - ...it would be
Sheldon's picture
Could you please cite half a
stillwater's picture
I think I understand the fine
Sheldon's picture
"I myself have put forward a
Someone's picture
No it is just your poor
Nyarlathotep's picture
Someone - The odds I supplied
Someone's picture
Your comment seems to reflect
Nyarlathotep's picture
The problem is you are using
Someone's picture
It is simply that with
Nyarlathotep's picture
Let me make a simple example:
Someone's picture
Each particle has about a 10
Nyarlathotep's picture
Someone - So roughly 10^3
LogicFTW's picture
@Someone
Someone's picture
I think you are looking at it
LogicFTW's picture
Fortunately I do not have to
Someone's picture
Because while most use the
Sheldon's picture
Could you cite any peer
stillwater's picture
"Just a scratch!"
stillwater's picture
"No it is just your poor
Mutorc S'yriah's picture
adragonist, if the universe
stillwater's picture
You raise good points Mutorc

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.