Purpose

220 posts / 0 new
Last post
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Sapporo said:
Sapporo's picture
You seem to be confusing
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Sapporo said:
Sheldon's picture
Far more things were
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Sheldon said:
Sheldon's picture
"I don't detect the relevance
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Sheldon said:
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
The BlindWatchmaker said:
TheBlindWatchmaker's picture
1) And yet his comments stand
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
We attach our own meaning
Sapporo's picture
Your teleological argument is
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Your teleological argument is
Sapporo's picture
Giving purpose to a closed
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Giving purpose to a closed
TheBlindWatchmaker's picture
Your entire premise is the
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
TheBlindwatchmaker said:
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Also there would be
TheBlindWatchmaker's picture
Science works by producing
fishy1's picture
Again, we could only have a
TheBlindWatchmaker's picture
Hi Fishy1,
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Science works by producing
TheBlindWatchmaker's picture
Wrong again, Honestly. The
Nyarlathotep's picture
Sapporo - [PGJ's conjecture]
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
TheBlindWatchmaker said:
TheBlindWatchmaker's picture
Because, In order to test
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
Fishy1 said:
ProgrammingGodJordan's picture
1.) If you actually take the
Sapporo's picture
Given that the objective
Cognostic's picture
@LucyAustralopithecus Said -
TheBlindWatchmaker's picture
That is your subjective

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.