Lmale
I searched using, how did dinosaurs breath. I found it somewhat interesting as to the suggestion of air sacks. But then as I read more and more I find that they are speculating, with no evidence. I copied part of a sight and the link.
[
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/science/profiles/wedel_0609.php

Establishing that dinosaurs had a bird-like air sac system leads to yet another question: did these pneumatized dinosaurs breathe like birds — did they use their air sacs to pump air through their lungs in a continuous flow? If saurischian dinosaurs did have this sort of "hot-rod" respiratory system, it could overturn current views of how active dinosaurs were. But answering that question will require more work, suggests Matt. "Solving the problem of how dinosaurs actually breathed is going to take the intersection of several different lines of research. I can bring the air sac piece of the pie, and say 'Well at least they had the soft tissue gear to make this happen.' Somebody else is going to have to look at birds and alligators and as many intermediates as they can, and look at muscle attachment scars to figure out how the trunk muscles evolved...And somebody else is going to have to come with the rib movement and say 'If these muscles contract in such and such a way...it's going to drive air through the lungs.' You've really got to have all three pieces: somebody who knows the bones, somebody who knows the muscles, and somebody who knows the air sacs."]

Now that doesn't mean that they didn't breathe with unidirectional breathing. But not like birds because there is no relation between birds and lizards. I have already shown you that. There are no lizards today that have air sacks to help them breathe. I seen some sites that claim certain reptiles breathe like birds. But yet even within those sites, [like the one here
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/monitor-lizards-found-to-breat... ]
clearly show that the way lizards and birds breathe are different. The birds use air sacks that are connected to the lungs through hollow bones. Yet the lizards they claim breathe like birds, have everything to breathe unidirectionally within the lungs themselves. A great design but yet totally different than birds. Yet the canopy of water at the edge of space and our atmosphere, still would have been needed for extra pressure so large flying bugs, and the pterosaurs to fly.

No, absolutely not, God makes sense, evolution makes none. Because there is nothing to back it up. Evolution is factually incorrect. Wake up and start making logical conclusions to the assumptions evolutionists make. They just don't add up. Have you seen how they make the assumption that dinosaurs or lizards, even alligators, breathe like birds. But yet it is done in a completely different way. Just because they want you to believe lizards turned into birds. A ground up evolution. But yet now I've read some are claiming a down evolution instead. They can't even agree on things. As soon as new evidence pops up they have to back track and change their speculations. Why?

You have never made a case for contradictions in the Bible. And I have asked repeatedly. You only brought up some so called scripture. You never showed it was wrong. And when I asked you if you knew what it was about you didn't respond. So again give me some real scripture. Tell me what it's all about, and then tell me why it is wrong. Also since you claim it is contradicting, give me two or more scriptures that contradict each other.

Lmale,
How is it that you can't see the simplicity of Genesis chapter one and two?
A child could see that.
It's so simple, chapter one is an overview of the truth of how God created everything. Chapter two details how God created man. He did create the beasts, and cattle, and creeping thing first. But after He created Adam, He made two more of every kind of creature. Not only for Adam to name them, but mainly so Adam could see God's power.
Have you not ever read a news story were the writer gives an overview first and then goes into details about what happened? I've seen many things wrote that way.

I will go to that website and I will respond to the so called contradictions. Most likely the one that made it up didn't do much of studying.

Oh and by the way God was the writer of the Bible. The men just penned down the word.
Haven't you ever heard of writers that have someone to take shorthand while the writer speaks about what he or she wants wrote? It's that simple.

Again I must ask, why do you get so angry when someone questions what you believe if it's true? Maybe you just hate it when someone points out things you can't defend?