The dark side of Theism & Superstition

829 posts / 0 new
Last post
CyberLN's picture
The statistics do indicate

The statistics do indicate those things. However, what those data do not tell us is root cause for the differences.

Jeff Vella Leone's picture
root cause meaning what? that

root cause meaning what? that the jury nearly always side with the mother for custody.

As if they side with the husband they would be hanged or something?

what excuse can you come up with, apart that woman are privileged more then man because they are woman?

Travis Hedglin's picture
True, but the exact SAME

True, but the exact SAME thing has been said about the wage gap, yet it still exists and is used as evidence of patriarchy. I think this is pretty good evidence that we don't simply live in a patriarchy, but a paradigm were both men and women have struck a balance, and these things are simply the results of that balance.

Jeff Vella Leone's picture
"True, but the exact SAME

"True, but the exact SAME thing has been said about the wage gap"

not really

wages are the same regardless of sex.
If woman choose to go for safer jobs, it's their choice.
Most unemployed are men, because men choose riskier jobs.
None of them come complaining that woman are less unemployed because they know they chose it.
Feminists must face reality and accept the fact that the wage gap is because woman choose safer jobs that pay less.

children custody are not the same, they are dependent on the sex.

"results of that balance."

I more think nothing is perfect and there is always room for improvement.

Discrimination against men when it comes to custody must cease.

That is the JUST thing to do.

What happened was that the man being a gentlemen and mentally more resistant then woman, would himself not deny the mother from her children even if it would break his heart.
This grant with time was taken for granted, that is the truth.

Feminists just spit on that every time they complain about things like Founding Fathers nonsense.
When it comes to the things that matter legally, woman are really walking in grace.

CyberLN's picture
Perhaps you are right about a

Perhaps you are right about a balance being struck. Where it can get sticky is in considering generalities versus specifics. And, that balance may not yet be optimal (although I have a great deal of trust that forward momentum will continue).

I mention root cause because reviewing history is critical in fully explaining what is today. And I suspect that it is a very long history full of many details that brings us to this conversation. We could get into specifics but I have too many other struggles going on to afford it that sort of attention right now.

What I will say is that I hear many folks say that men are downtrodden and many that say women are. I absolutely think that each gender could be said to have its societal benefits and drawbacks. Personally, I quite like being female (except it's far easier for men to pee off the side of a boat). It seems to me that it is shortsighted for anyone to claim that overall, one gender is forced to eat more shit than the other. It's just different shit.

I have no problem identifying as feminist. That is because I define that as supporting equality for women. And I support that. I also have no problem sporting a rainbow although I'm not gay. I support a lot of things and being called a supporter of any one of them does NOT exclude my support of any other thing.

Feminism is just a word. That so many people get so riled up by that word astonishes me. Call it feminism, call it humanism, call it Fred. In the end, it makes no substantive difference.

In these debates I hear folks say it's always this way or always that way....women are always such and thus, men are always such and thus. To those people I say, horse shit. I would hope most of us would.

Travis Hedglin's picture
"Where it can get sticky is

"Where it can get sticky is in considering generalities versus specifics."

That is true of everything, even religions. We still make general statements about it, though.

"And, that balance may not yet be optimal (although I have a great deal of trust that forward momentum will continue)."

Well, it tends to work itself out. That balance is part of what has allowed us as a species to propagate, as new challenges and situations arise, the balance can work itself out. Forcing anything, at it were, could actually cause more problems than it solves.

"I mention root cause because reviewing history is critical in fully explaining what is today. And I suspect that it is a very long history full of many details that brings us to this conversation. We could get into specifics but I have too many other struggles going on to afford it that sort of attention right now."

History is important, to some extent, but we cannot allow ourselves to be so chained to the past that we cannot deal with things as they are NOW.

"What I will say is that I hear many folks say that men are downtrodden and many that say women are."

Both are, in different ways, because both behave in fairly different ways.

"I absolutely think that each gender could be said to have its societal benefits and drawbacks. Personally, I quite like being female (except it's far easier for men to pee off the side of a boat). It seems to me that it is shortsighted for anyone to claim that overall, one gender is forced to eat more shit than the other. It's just different shit."

Indeed. However, for the better part of a century women have been pushing back against the drawbacks, and men haven't until recently. We should TRY to keep things neutral in law, as much as possible, or we risk systematic sexism.

"I have no problem identifying as feminist. That is because I define that as supporting equality for women. And I support that. I also have no problem sporting a rainbow although I'm not gay. I support a lot of things and being called a supporter of any one of them does NOT exclude my support of any other thing."

I am more a humanist, because I don't focus so much on gender. I think all humans should have equal rights and responsibilities under the law, no matter what.

"Feminism is just a word. That so many people get so riled up by that word astonishes me. Call it feminism, call it humanism, call it Fred. In the end, it makes no substantive difference."

Feminism has grown beyond its definition. It now encompasses some strange political beliefs, ideological baggage, and truly strange ideals. Where I live the "feminist" cause of the day appears to be "manspreading", and after the better part of an hour of me trying to explain the multiple anatomical reasons men don't sit with their knees together, I realized that they did not care about facts. They also proceeded to tell me that my attempt to educate them on those reasons was "mansplaining", and that I should "check my privilege". I am honestly at a loss for how to deal with people like that...

"In these debates I hear folks say it's always this way or always that way....women are always such and thus, men are always such and thus. To those people I say, horse shit. I would hope most of us would."

Always? No. There are averages, like men having more muscle mass on average, or women being shorter of stature. These are not universals, but they are actual trends. There are also some behavioral trends, such as women being more likely to volunteer to stay home and raise the children, and men with families having a higher rate of overworking(55+hours a week). I think it is important to consider these things when discussing the genders collectively, but not relevant when talking about individuals. For instance, women have wider hips on average than men, but I am so much damn wider than my wife that my hips are 5-10 inches wider than hers.

CyberLN's picture
"Forcing anything, at it were

"Forcing anything, at it were, could actually cause more problems than it solves."

Could, but how often does it? There are so many examples where it hasn't of course. Sorta like pulling a bandaid of quickly, eh?

"History is important, to some extent, but we cannot allow ourselves to be so chained to the past that we cannot deal with things as they are NOW."

I concur. I mentioned it because understanding how something got to be the way it is frequently assists in choosing a more efficient way forward.

"We should TRY to keep things neutral in law, as much as possible, or we risk systematic sexism."

Couldn't agree more...with those laws in place, we can focus on what is damaging but not specifically against any laws. But just because something is illegal, certainly doesn't mean it won't happen. I've been discriminated against in the workplace. It was illegal. It still happened. It has happened multiple times...some overt, some insidious. Perusing it takes a multitude of tolls that many people are simply unable or unwilling to endure and is too often unsuccessful.

"I am more a humanist, because I don't focus so much on gender. I think all humans should have equal rights and responsibilities under the law, no matter what."

I agree. I don't focus on only one thing either. I personally don't have any allergies to identifying as, among other things, feminist.

"Feminism has grown beyond its definition. It now encompasses some strange political beliefs, ideological baggage, and truly strange ideals."

I disagree. Feminism hasn't, some people have. I agree that there are people identifying as feminist who are quite radical. I am not convinced that most are. To assert all feminists are anything in particular seems to me to be equal to saying "all atheists are (fill in the blank)". It's just not true. I've been fortunate perhaps...every person with whom I am affiliated who identifies as feminist would not say anything akin to "all men are (fill in the blank)" because they don't think that.

"Where I live the "feminist" cause of the day appears to be "manspreading", and after the better part of an hour of me trying to explain the multiple anatomical reasons men don't sit with their knees together, I realized that they did not care about facts. They also proceeded to tell me that my attempt to educate them on those reasons was "mansplaining", and that I should "check my privilege". I am honestly at a loss for how to deal with people like that..."

Well, based on that, my opinion is that those people were silly. How to deal with them? I'd probably find myself chuckling, shaking my head, and walking away.

"Always? No. There are averages...(truncating)"

I have no argument with that. My point was that there are people who do indeed say 'always', it's their opinion and more often raw emotion. I'm finding that in other posts by other posters in this string.

My husband is wider than me too...my fault, I'm the cook and make a mean sweet & sour brisket.

In the end, Travis, I don't think we disagree on all that much...

Travis Hedglin's picture
"Could, but how often does it

"Could, but how often does it?"

Often, in the animal kingdom. We now have almost hit a record low in marriage rates, even with gay marriage being legal. Also, as far as longevity is concerned, around 53% of heterosexual marriages end in a divorce. We don't have the numbers on homosexual marriages yet, just to be clear, I wasn't leaving them out to be an ass. We are a society whose structure is shifting away from a family-oriented paradigm, and toward single parenthood and hook-up culture. If the sociological studies done on the issues are any indicator, we are headed for a dark time indeed. Gay marriages, and the families created by it, may wind up being the most stable relationships in our society.

"There are so many examples where it hasn't of course. Sorta like pulling a bandaid of quickly, eh?"

We'll see, but it doesn't look like it at all, I'm afraid.

"I concur. I mentioned it because understanding how something got to be the way it is frequently assists in choosing a more efficient way forward."

Sometimes, but at times it is also a millstone around the neck. There are a number of cases where the way forward is blocked by people clinging to tightly to a past that no longer exists. This is true across almost all spectrum's.

"Couldn't agree more...with those laws in place, we can focus on what is damaging but not specifically against any laws."

I can generally agree, but need specific examples. For if we aren't talking about creating new laws, addressing such "damages" becomes more a civil than a legal matter. In a system that fluid, success in redressing damages is hardly a guarantee.

"But just because something is illegal, certainly doesn't mean it won't happen."

If only. It does make it a bit easier to deal with, however.

"I've been discriminated against in the workplace. It was illegal. It still happened. It has happened multiple times...some overt, some insidious. Perusing it takes a multitude of tolls that many people are simply unable or unwilling to endure and is too often unsuccessful."

I can't really comment on it, not knowing about it, but it does happen. I'm not sure what can be done to fix it completely.

"I agree. I don't focus on only one thing either. I personally don't have any allergies to identifying as, among other things, feminist."

It isn't an allergy, it is a separation, I don't want to be grouped with radicals that use their nonsense to hurt and destroy other people. That is part of what convinced me religion was wrong in the first place.

"I disagree. Feminism hasn't, some people have. I agree that there are people identifying as feminist who are quite radical. I am not convinced that most are. To assert all feminists are anything in particular seems to me to be equal to saying "all atheists are (fill in the blank)". It's just not true. I've been fortunate perhaps...every person with whom I am affiliated who identifies as feminist would not say anything akin to "all men are (fill in the blank)" because they don't think that."

If there were a large minority of atheist running around and acting like "radical feminists" do, I would call myself something besides and atheist to. I have the right of association, or disassociation as it were, if I don't want to be associated with a group with a vocal minority doing terrible things in the name of their beliefs or lack thereof.

"Well, based on that, my opinion is that those people were silly."

I live in a town with three universities, they are the majority here.

"How to deal with them? I'd probably find myself chuckling, shaking my head, and walking away."

At least two men were arrested for it in New York, and it is a $50 dollar fine on the MTA. Shake your head and walk away from that.

"I have no argument with that. My point was that there are people who do indeed say 'always', it's their opinion and more often raw emotion. I'm finding that in other posts by other posters in this string."

Probably, I am not one big on emotional arguments, myself.

"My husband is wider than me too...my fault, I'm the cook and make a mean sweet & sour brisket."

I cook about half of the time, but our difference is due to me being 6'3" and her being 5'5". She barely comes up to my sternum.

"In the end, Travis, I don't think we disagree on all that much..."

Perhaps not, but I think a conversation across the aisle needs to occur, because it seems to me that people tend to get half rabid on this topic. I am a human rights advocate, and have often discussed and wrote about both mens and womens rights, at different times. As a human rights advocate, I find myself often at odds with ideological feminists, because they tend to be the ones resisting things like battered mens shelters and more equitable family courts by abolishing the outdated and one-sided Duluth Model. I have personally received death threats I am not allowed to talk about specifically because of investigations, and threats against my family as well. I cannot recall a single time I received any such threat while working to keep my community planned parenthood open.

I'm sorry, I just can't see them as you seem to.

Jeff Vella Leone's picture
"Not sure I'd jump straight

"Not sure I'd jump straight to misogynist"
What did he say to deserve to be labeled misogynist even remotly?
He just pointed at facts, that can be verified, he did not hate, dislike, mistrust, or mistreat women.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/misogynist

At worst he showed his opinion on the current social system.

You would be a hypocrite to agree that he can be called a misogynist by anyone for just that.

This is like me saying;
"Not sure I'd jump straight to rapist" when talking about you(Travis).
Do I have the right to make that baseless accusation? or even hint at it?

Its not about jumping, its about not accusing people without valid reason.

I hope you agree that he did not show he is misogynist from what he posted thus far.
right?

science's picture
It all has remained the same

It all has remained the same forever...fathers are for having babies, and paying for things... THAT is the way "society" has treated us!!

Nyarlathotep's picture
Wow we hit a gusher! Anyone

renested post

Jeff Vella Leone's picture
No it doesn't and if you keep

No it doesn't and if you keep accusing people of being Mysaginist just because of your opinion(this breaking guide no 6) I will keep reporting you until you get banned for it.

+ You accused him "Mysoginist" before that post was even made, making your claim just an evident and pathetic excuse.

Nyarlathotep's picture
Do what you think you have to

Do what you think you have to do Jeff.

tinastrich's picture
The only way the confines and

The only way the confines and limitations humanity brings upon itself via religious indoctrination can be lifted is through education. People need to educate their children with science and fact. Fortunately, the atheistic and agnostic trends are growing in the world, especially in America. Hopefully, it will grow to eliminate the ignorance of talking to imaginative gods and deities. I find it difficult to believe that people still need a psychotic group for comfort. I also find it frustrating that these people, who by the way were the fastest sperm to the egg, are so programmed in their indoctrination they can't see the light, as it were. Imagine if humans evolved without religion. I wonder where we would be scientifically?

tinastrich's picture
As a former Christian who

As a former Christian who became anti-theist after I read the bible, I recall many Sunday mornings of listening to boring shit about Noah, Cain and Abel, and Moses splitting the Red Sea. I never head the ones about the negative shit in the bible. Genesis is full of that crap. If a man tried to slaughter his son today to prove his faith to a god, he'd be in big trouble. Wonder why preacher man didn't talk about that stuff? That's the primary thing I discovered after becoming educated and free from the bonds of the bible... the only things the preacher talked about in church were the neat little bible stories they wanted us the hear. How about the 2 million g-man slaughtered, when compared to the Devil's dozen or so? It's deliberate programming, it is. And, it's a damn shame people still fall for this. Here is something else I was also misfortunate (if that's a word) enough to witness each year as a good little Christian boy.... http://arizonatimesnews.com/former-tent-revival-preacher-says-he-secretl...

ThePragmatic's picture
Thank you for sharing and for

Thank you for sharing and for bringing this thread back to it's subject.

science's picture
People are just plain stupid.

People are just plain stupid...even if you belt them over the head with evidence of what is going on right in front of their noses, they STILL refuse to denounce this God, religion nonsense.

ThePragmatic's picture
Raif Badawi "is expected to

Raif Badawi "is expected to receive the second 50 lashes of a 1,000-lash sentence soon"
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/27/middleeast/saudi-blogger-flogging-bada...

"Source Says Floggings Will Continue for Raif Badawi"
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/10/27/source-says-flog...

Vincent Paul Tran1's picture
Discrimination or lack

Discrimination or lack thereof depends on the situation. I live in a n. Oil town and oil people don't care about gender as long as the job is done. Literature and movies do discriminate against women though

ThePragmatic's picture
So, when the dust has finally

So, when the dust has finally settled from a big of-topic dispute of the most inflamed subject mentionable on the forum, you add another post to it? *slaps you in the back of the head*
:P

Vincent Paul Tran1's picture
Whoops

Whoops

ThePragmatic's picture
Sorry, didn't mean to rip

Sorry, didn't mean to rip your head off.
:D

ThePragmatic's picture
Talibans in Afganistan has

Talibans in Afganistan has stoned a young woman to death for eloping with her lover.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/03/in-video-young-a...

ThePragmatic's picture
"Texas Supreme Court To

"Texas Supreme Court To Decide if Home-Schooling Parents Can Stop Educating Their Kids Due to the Rapture"
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/02/texas-supreme-co...

ThePragmatic's picture
"Another Atheist Hacked to

"Another Atheist Hacked to Death in Bangladesh (Three Others Were Injured)"
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/10/31/another-atheist-...

And a follow up on that:
"The Deaths of Five Atheist Activists Were “Isolated Incidents,” Says Bangladeshi Official"
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/11/01/the-deaths-of-fi...

ThePragmatic's picture
Ahh, the holy sanctity of

Ahh, the holy sanctity of marriage...

"Tennessee man charged with raping wife in church parking lot: ‘I am your husband, I can get it anytime I want’"
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/tennessee-man-charged-with-raping-wife-i...

CyberLN's picture
He actually said he "can get

He actually said he "can get IT"? Like pussy is just a commodity?

ThePragmatic's picture
Apparently it he said: "I am

It appears he said: "I am your husband, I can’t rape you. I can get it anytime I want."

CyberLN's picture
Oh my, people like that just

Oh my, people like that just make me roll my eyes so far I see my own brain...

Travis Hedglin's picture
Fucking sickening.

Fucking sickening.

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.