What would constitute proof of God's existence?

238 posts / 0 new
Last post
LogicFTW's picture
Heh, his postings are getting
Sheldon's picture
"after he has given you
David Killens's picture
@ Fig
Sapporo's picture
If god does not need to be
Sheldon's picture
"Where all guilty"
Dave Matson's picture
FIG,
Tin-Man's picture
@Greensnake Re: FIG
Dave Matson's picture
Tin-man,
Old man shouts at clouds's picture
@ TM
Dave Matson's picture
"Proof" is not the right word
jonthecatholic's picture
Way back when I started this
Tin-Man's picture
@JoC Re: "A bear in the
Dave Matson's picture
FIG,
Old man shouts at clouds's picture
@ JoC
Dave Matson's picture
JoC,
jonthecatholic's picture
Exactly my point. If I
Kataclismic's picture
No JoC, you missed the point.
Dave Matson's picture
If you don't have the
Sheldon's picture
"Which is why the question is
Sapporo's picture
@JoC
jonthecatholic's picture
I have defined God. Go ahead.
Sapporo's picture
JoC: Fair enough though, I
jonthecatholic's picture
Well, I have a problem with
Sapporo's picture
The laws of nature
Kataclismic's picture
Again, He would have to be
jonthecatholic's picture
Why would God have to be self
Sheldon's picture
"Why would God have to be
Kataclismic's picture
No JoC, I already explained
Jamesroper35's picture
There is a large divide
Sheldon's picture
It's impossible to ignore the

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.