Agreeing with religious people

256 posts / 0 new
Last post
mykcob4's picture
BULLSHIT. An honest mistake
the_believer's picture
You still act as though you
Deforres's picture
You'll find our mod prefers
the_believer's picture
I take it you've had a run-in
Deforres's picture
Actually, the one who invited
the_believer's picture
Does he prefer to argue the
Deforres's picture
Why? A spam war is what it is
the_believer's picture
From the behavioral
Deforres's picture
On the flip side of the coin,
mykcob4's picture
Don't you dare lecture me. I
Deforres's picture
No mercy.
the_believer's picture
Predicate calculus
Deforres's picture
"not a wise characteristic
Drewcgs11's picture
I have nothing more to say in
Deforres's picture
Farewell, tovarich.
mykcob4's picture
You won't "reach a higher
Deforres's picture
My question: since when the
the_believer's picture
I think that it's called
Deforres's picture
Probability is the likely
the_believer's picture
:)
Deforres's picture
That is indeed an interesting
the_believer's picture
Under normal circumstances,
Drewcgs11's picture
Probability is based on
mykcob4's picture
@Andrewcgs
Drewcgs11's picture
True well lets say the cave
mykcob4's picture
Bluster, name call, it doesn
the_believer's picture
I think you mean "past the
chimp3's picture
Okay ! I am reposting
Drewcgs11's picture
Exactly so my original post
Drewcgs11's picture
Chimp 3 i have stated many

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.