On Rules

324 posts / 0 new
Last post
Witness1625's picture
"Have you missed the exchange
Travis Hedglin's picture
"Do you agree with this
Witness1625's picture
Okay, Now to me it sounds
Travis Hedglin's picture
No, in order for a
Witness1625's picture
Laws of logic however are
Travis Hedglin's picture
The laws themselves are
Witness1625's picture
The law of non-contradiction
Travis Hedglin's picture
A law describing interaction
Witness1625's picture
Do you believe that laws of
Travis Hedglin's picture
Immaterial objects? Can you
Witness1625's picture
Laws of Logic
Witness1625's picture
Thoughts, concepts, etc. All
Travis Hedglin's picture
Absolutely NONE of those
Witness1625's picture
We might say something is an
Travis Hedglin's picture
We are talking about concepts
Witness1625's picture
Square circles however are
Travis Hedglin's picture
"Illogical" has no bearing on
Witness1625's picture
Good.
Travis Hedglin's picture
They have been revised and
watchman's picture
Witness posted......
Witness1625's picture
So you are saying that I am
CyberLN's picture
Take a course in or read up
Witness1625's picture
They follow their instinct.
watchman's picture
They do indeed follow their
Witness1625's picture
So then do you believe that
watchman's picture
Sorry Caleb......I nearly
Witness1625's picture
"it has never been "okay" for
watchman's picture
There are NO absolutes ......
Witness1625's picture
So in some circumstances, not
Witness1625's picture
"contradictions can be used

Pages

Donating = Loving

Heart Icon

Bringing you atheist articles and building active godless communities takes hundreds of hours and resources each month. If you find any joy or stimulation at Atheist Republic, please consider becoming a Supporting Member with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a cup of tea and a good dinner.

Or make a one-time donation in any amount.